Tools & Wizards About Us
windowssc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

windowssc.com

Home - Window and Door Solutions

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

144 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

224 ms

windowssc.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to windowssc.com homepage info - get ready to check Window Ssc best content right away, or after learning these important things about windowssc.com

Visit windowssc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Windowssc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

windowssc.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value890 ms

32/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

windowssc.com

144 ms

windowssc.com

957 ms

formidableforms.css

59 ms

style.min.css

115 ms

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

161 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Windowssc.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (957 ms) belongs to the original domain Windowssc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 78.1 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Windowssc.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 469.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 52.2 kB

  • Original 67.5 kB
  • After minification 65.6 kB
  • After compression 15.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 469.1 kB
  • After minification 450.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Window Ssc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 433.0 kB
  • After minification 433.0 kB
  • After compression 431.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 143.7 kB
  • After minification 143.5 kB
  • After compression 138.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Windowssc.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (75%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Window Ssc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

windowssc.com

windowssc.com

144 ms

windowssc.com

windowssc.com

957 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

59 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

115 ms

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

font-awesome-legacy.min.css

161 ms

grid-system.css

grid-system.css

155 ms

style.css

style.css

167 ms

header-secondary-nav.css

header-secondary-nav.css

156 ms

css

css

38 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

157 ms

skin-original.css

skin-original.css

177 ms

menu-dynamic.css

menu-dynamic.css

208 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

208 ms

salient-dynamic-styles.css

salient-dynamic-styles.css

218 ms

style.css

style.css

207 ms

css

css

62 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

236 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

247 ms

style-non-critical.css

style-non-critical.css

297 ms

magnific.css

magnific.css

298 ms

core.css

core.css

340 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

341 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

357 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

393 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

355 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

357 ms

priority.js

priority.js

393 ms

transit.min.js

transit.min.js

393 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

400 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

399 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

399 ms

magnific.js

magnific.js

431 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

433 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

430 ms

init.js

init.js

522 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

449 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

449 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

108 ms

white-logo.png

white-logo.png

228 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

227 ms

icon-new-construction.png

icon-new-construction.png

225 ms

icon-remodeling-replacement.png

icon-remodeling-replacement.png

272 ms

icon-commercial.png

icon-commercial.png

271 ms

embed

embed

267 ms

services-bg-orange.jpg

services-bg-orange.jpg

242 ms

about-bg.png

about-bg.png

382 ms

font

font

102 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

242 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

461 ms

font

font

54 ms

collect

collect

38 ms

js

js

87 ms

js

js

70 ms

search.js

search.js

5 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

8 ms

main.js

main.js

13 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

105 ms

Accessibility Review

windowssc.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

windowssc.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

windowssc.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Windowssc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Windowssc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

windowssc.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Window Ssc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: