Tools & Wizards About Us
windwordliteraryservices.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

windwordliteraryservices.com

Windword Literary Services | Professional Writing, Editing, Proofreading, & Manuscript Evaluations

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

260 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

233 ms

windwordliteraryservices.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to windwordliteraryservices.com homepage info - get ready to check Windword Literary Services best content right away, or after learning these important things about windwordliteraryservices.com

Find out more about our professional writing, editing, proofreading, and manuscript evaluations today at Windword Literary Services.

Visit windwordliteraryservices.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Windwordliteraryservices.com page load time and found that the first response time was 260 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

windwordliteraryservices.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

58/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

windwordliteraryservices.com

260 ms

windwordliteraryservices.com

608 ms

system.base.css

103 ms

system.menus.css

204 ms

system.messages.css

290 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Windwordliteraryservices.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (816 ms) belongs to the original domain Windwordliteraryservices.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 60.4 kB (16%)

Content Size

378.8 kB

After Optimization

318.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Windwordliteraryservices.com main page is 378.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 217.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 30.4 kB

  • Original 37.9 kB
  • After minification 35.4 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 217.7 kB
  • After minification 207.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Windword Literary Services images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 100.4 kB
  • After minification 98.6 kB
  • After compression 86.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 22.8 kB
  • After minification 22.8 kB
  • After compression 16.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Windwordliteraryservices.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (68%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Windword Literary Services. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

windwordliteraryservices.com

windwordliteraryservices.com

260 ms

windwordliteraryservices.com

windwordliteraryservices.com

608 ms

system.base.css

system.base.css

103 ms

system.menus.css

system.menus.css

204 ms

system.messages.css

system.messages.css

290 ms

system.theme.css

system.theme.css

293 ms

scroll_to_top.css

scroll_to_top.css

293 ms

aggregator.css

aggregator.css

302 ms

aweber_webform.css

aweber_webform.css

305 ms

book.css

book.css

304 ms

comment.css

comment.css

385 ms

field.css

field.css

388 ms

node.css

node.css

390 ms

poll.css

poll.css

401 ms

search.css

search.css

404 ms

user.css

user.css

404 ms

forum.css

forum.css

480 ms

views.css

views.css

485 ms

ckeditor.css

ckeditor.css

486 ms

colorbox_default_style.css

colorbox_default_style.css

502 ms

ctools.css

ctools.css

504 ms

follow.css

follow.css

505 ms

panels.css

panels.css

575 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

580 ms

superfish-vertical.css

superfish-vertical.css

583 ms

superfish-navbar.css

superfish-navbar.css

601 ms

views_jqfx_cycle.css

views_jqfx_cycle.css

603 ms

boilerplate.css

boilerplate.css

605 ms

style.css

style.css

672 ms

maintenance-page.css

maintenance-page.css

676 ms

local.css

local.css

679 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

804 ms

jquery.once.js

jquery.once.js

704 ms

drupal.js

drupal.js

705 ms

aweber_webform.js

aweber_webform.js

767 ms

jquery.qtip-1.0.0-rc3.min.js

jquery.qtip-1.0.0-rc3.min.js

773 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

777 ms

colorbox.js

colorbox.js

816 ms

colorbox_default_style.js

colorbox_default_style.js

723 ms

scroll_to_top.js

scroll_to_top.js

667 ms

jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js

jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js

589 ms

jquery.bgiframe.min.js

jquery.bgiframe.min.js

590 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

619 ms

supersubs.js

supersubs.js

612 ms

supposition.js

supposition.js

610 ms

sftouchscreen.js

sftouchscreen.js

662 ms

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

590 ms

views_jqfx_cycle.js

views_jqfx_cycle.js

590 ms

googleanalytics.js

googleanalytics.js

623 ms

theme672.core.js

theme672.core.js

611 ms

jquery.loader.js

jquery.loader.js

610 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

102 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

64 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

105 ms

main-bg.gif

main-bg.gif

103 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

102 ms

menu-spacer.gif

menu-spacer.gif

104 ms

menu-bg.gif

menu-bg.gif

105 ms

sailing2.jpg

sailing2.jpg

344 ms

slider-caption-bg.png

slider-caption-bg.png

203 ms

border-bot.png

border-bot.png

203 ms

view-article-bg.jpg

view-article-bg.jpg

294 ms

spacer-1.png

spacer-1.png

205 ms

marker-1.gif

marker-1.gif

206 ms

border-bot1.png

border-bot1.png

293 ms

sailing3_0.jpg

sailing3_0.jpg

297 ms

marker-2.png

marker-2.png

306 ms

icon-facebook.png

icon-facebook.png

307 ms

icon-twitter.png

icon-twitter.png

388 ms

icon-pinterest.png

icon-pinterest.png

391 ms

up-arrow.png

up-arrow.png

394 ms

loading_animation.gif

loading_animation.gif

407 ms

colorb-bg.png

colorb-bg.png

408 ms

controls.png

controls.png

444 ms

css

css

52 ms

collect

collect

40 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

23 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

36 ms

js

js

79 ms

Accessibility Review

windwordliteraryservices.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

windwordliteraryservices.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

windwordliteraryservices.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Windwordliteraryservices.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Windwordliteraryservices.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

windwordliteraryservices.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Windword Literary Services. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: