Tools & Wizards About Us
winfaq.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

winfaq.de

Die deutsche WinFAQ im Internet

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

441 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

145 ms

winfaq.de screenshot

About Website

Visit winfaq.de now to see the best up-to-date WinFAQ content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about winfaq.de

Fragen und Antworten rund um Windows, die ultimative FAQ im Internet

Visit winfaq.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Winfaq.de page load time and found that the first response time was 441 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

winfaq.de performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,060 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.064

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

winfaq.de

441 ms

www.winfaq.de

344 ms

basic.css

120 ms

layout.css

226 ms

consent_widget.js

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Winfaq.de, 15% (9 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 15% (9 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (637 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 215.0 kB (27%)

Content Size

783.4 kB

After Optimization

568.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Winfaq.de main page is 783.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 637.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 14.7 kB

  • Original 20.2 kB
  • After minification 18.6 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 11.7 kB

  • Original 122.1 kB
  • After minification 110.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WinFAQ images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 187.5 kB

  • Original 637.7 kB
  • After minification 637.7 kB
  • After compression 450.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 187.5 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 3.5 kB
  • After minification 3.4 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Winfaq.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (44%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WinFAQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

winfaq.de

winfaq.de

441 ms

www.winfaq.de

www.winfaq.de

344 ms

basic.css

basic.css

120 ms

layout.css

layout.css

226 ms

consent_widget.js

consent_widget.js

35 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

67 ms

head_color.jpg

head_color.jpg

115 ms

search_input.gif

search_input.gif

113 ms

search_submit.gif

search_submit.gif

221 ms

head_site.jpg

head_site.jpg

326 ms

hintergrund_06.gif

hintergrund_06.gif

221 ms

ico_archive.gif

ico_archive.gif

218 ms

xml.gif

xml.gif

223 ms

RSW.NET_Beta.JPG

RSW.NET_Beta.JPG

223 ms

windows10.jpg

windows10.jpg

335 ms

rsw_update.jpg

rsw_update.jpg

342 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

110 ms

hintergrund_07.gif

hintergrund_07.gif

324 ms

hintergrung_01.gif

hintergrung_01.gif

321 ms

content_article_bg.jpg

content_article_bg.jpg

321 ms

content_title_bg.gif

content_title_bg.gif

458 ms

btn_more.gif

btn_more.gif

459 ms

hintergrund_04.gif

hintergrund_04.gif

453 ms

adj.php

adj.php

361 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

237 ms

fehler.htm

fehler.htm

269 ms

fehler.htm

fehler.htm

141 ms

fehler.htm

fehler.htm

143 ms

hintergrund_05.gif

hintergrund_05.gif

166 ms

front.asp

front.asp

87 ms

fehler.htm

fehler.htm

119 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

39 ms

ads

ads

315 ms

ads

ads

637 ms

fehler.htm

fehler.htm

119 ms

3b0c1a1c8750041eb27603629860e89a.js

3b0c1a1c8750041eb27603629860e89a.js

35 ms

load_preloaded_resource.js

load_preloaded_resource.js

57 ms

f11bfab4e3c942216447974439595ef6.js

f11bfab4e3c942216447974439595ef6.js

57 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

83 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

93 ms

qs_click_protection.js

qs_click_protection.js

95 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

28 ms

bbcd6bf18c20baa1b2adeb195de9b551.js

bbcd6bf18c20baa1b2adeb195de9b551.js

80 ms

icon.png

icon.png

199 ms

14763004658117789537

14763004658117789537

184 ms

s

s

174 ms

css

css

163 ms

9108807597894390871

9108807597894390871

115 ms

one_click_handler_one_afma.js

one_click_handler_one_afma.js

32 ms

activeview

activeview

112 ms

FAz5UgRug7M8YaGFfFWxr9vetrg5Yv9xXEx-zc6kZAs.js

FAz5UgRug7M8YaGFfFWxr9vetrg5Yv9xXEx-zc6kZAs.js

18 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrw2IJllpyw.ttf

92 ms

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

4Ua_rENHsxJlGDuGo1OIlJfC6l_24rlCK1Yo_Iqcsih3SAyH6cAwhX9RFD48TE63OOYKtrwEIJllpyw.ttf

96 ms

sodar

sodar

115 ms

activeview

activeview

95 ms

sodar2.js

sodar2.js

5 ms

runner.html

runner.html

13 ms

aframe

aframe

28 ms

feg8rL66UTsTrrlS9w_iUH8JqR_kCfLFdi2W6wljJCU.js

feg8rL66UTsTrrlS9w_iUH8JqR_kCfLFdi2W6wljJCU.js

7 ms

Accessibility Review

winfaq.de accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

winfaq.de best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

winfaq.de SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Winfaq.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Winfaq.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

winfaq.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WinFAQ. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: