Tools & Wizards About Us
wint.global screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

wint.global

wint.global | DIE ZUKUNFT BEGINNT JETZT

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

297 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

305 ms

wint.global screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wint.global homepage info - get ready to check Wint best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about wint.global

100% CO2-neutrales Hosting zu absolut günstigen Preisen!

Visit wint.global

Key Findings

We analyzed Wint.global page load time and found that the first response time was 297 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wint.global performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value970 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.42

23/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

70/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wint.global

297 ms

wint.global

514 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

181 ms

677 ms

wint.globalhttps

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Wint.global, 15% (6 requests) were made to Login.wint.global and 3% (1 request) were made to 0. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (800 ms) relates to the external source Login.wint.global.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 164.9 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

835.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wint.global main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 728.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 112.0 kB

  • Original 134.3 kB
  • After minification 131.0 kB
  • After compression 22.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 52.2 kB

  • Original 728.1 kB
  • After minification 675.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wint images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 576 B

  • Original 90.3 kB
  • After minification 90.3 kB
  • After compression 89.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 81 B

  • Original 48.1 kB
  • After minification 48.1 kB
  • After compression 48.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wint.global has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (35%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wint.global

wint.global

297 ms

wint.global

wint.global

514 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

181 ms

677 ms

wint.globalhttps

wint.globalhttps

5 ms

630 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

578 ms

responsio.min.css

responsio.min.css

594 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

524 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

324 ms

540 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

498 ms

widgets.php

widgets.php

800 ms

292 ms

responsio.min.js

responsio.min.js

437 ms

662 ms

418 ms

WINTlogo.png

WINTlogo.png

260 ms

default.gif

default.gif

258 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

161 ms

best-seller.png

best-seller.png

152 ms

hostingemail-linux-Odin.png

hostingemail-linux-Odin.png

400 ms

Cloud.png

Cloud.png

344 ms

hosttest_100prozent.png

hosttest_100prozent.png

268 ms

hosttest_top20.png

hosttest_top20.png

279 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

279 ms

shadow2.png

shadow2.png

272 ms

produkt-pakete_background-1.jpg

produkt-pakete_background-1.jpg

660 ms

footer-bg-graph.png

footer-bg-graph.png

777 ms

scroll-top-arrow.png

scroll-top-arrow.png

316 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

271 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

280 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

323 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

335 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

387 ms

up-arrow-small.png

up-arrow-small.png

327 ms

background_slide.jpg

background_slide.jpg

413 ms

computer.png

computer.png

700 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

118 ms

Accessibility Review

wint.global accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

wint.global best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

wint.global SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wint.global can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wint.global main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wint.global

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wint. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: