4.4 sec in total
107 ms
3.7 sec
558 ms
Click here to check amazing Wire Belt content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wirebelt.com
Leading, trusted Metal Conveyor Belt Manufacturer. Stainless steel wire belts from Wire Belt Company of America. Call us at (603) 644-2500 for more information.
Visit wirebelt.comWe analyzed Wirebelt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 107 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
wirebelt.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value15,820 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value23.5 s
1/100
10%
107 ms
1600 ms
129 ms
629 ms
328 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Wirebelt.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to S.w.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Wirebelt.com.
Page size can be reduced by 504.3 kB (74%)
683.7 kB
179.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Wirebelt.com main page is 683.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 344.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 116.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wire Belt images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 91.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.9 kB or 48% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 295.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wirebelt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 295.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (67%)
39
13
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wire Belt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wirebelt.com
107 ms
wirebelt.com
1600 ms
e06eab840f.js
129 ms
launch-eab15b74264e.min.js
629 ms
uc.js
328 ms
style.min.css
329 ms
bundle.css
356 ms
jquery.min.js
90 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
353 ms
navigation.js
323 ms
bundle.min.js
320 ms
core.min.js
322 ms
menu.min.js
595 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
593 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
792 ms
dom-ready.min.js
792 ms
hooks.min.js
791 ms
i18n.min.js
791 ms
a11y.min.js
790 ms
autocomplete.min.js
790 ms
gtm.js
805 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
621 ms
embed
878 ms
white-logo.png
365 ms
boost-white-logo-footer.png
349 ms
cc.js
335 ms
bc-v4.min.html
260 ms
js
146 ms
1f1fa-1f1f8.svg
169 ms
1f1ec-1f1e7.svg
212 ms
1f1e9-1f1ea.svg
213 ms
analytics.js
194 ms
js
190 ms
invoca-latest.min.js
464 ms
twin.js
604 ms
js
255 ms
collect
84 ms
collect
144 ms
gen_204
83 ms
init_embed.js
111 ms
common.js
79 ms
wirebelt.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
wirebelt.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
wirebelt.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wirebelt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wirebelt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wirebelt.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wire Belt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: