3.1 sec in total
706 ms
2.2 sec
183 ms
Visit wirelesspetfencereview.com now to see the best up-to-date Wireless Pet Fence Review content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wirelesspetfencereview.com
Whats the best wireless pet fence on the market? Dont risk your beloved pets, read the in depth reviews and get the best advice to help you choose the right product.
Visit wirelesspetfencereview.comWe analyzed Wirelesspetfencereview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 706 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
wirelesspetfencereview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value13.9 s
0/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value600 ms
49/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.0 s
43/100
10%
706 ms
89 ms
142 ms
97 ms
193 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Wirelesspetfencereview.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Freegeoip.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (706 ms) belongs to the original domain Wirelesspetfencereview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 185.8 kB (50%)
373.1 kB
187.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Wirelesspetfencereview.com main page is 373.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 188.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.3 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wireless Pet Fence Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 129.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 129.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wirelesspetfencereview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (64%)
28
10
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wireless Pet Fence Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.wirelesspetfencereview.com
706 ms
style.css
89 ms
toolbar.css
142 ms
styles.css
97 ms
jquery.js
193 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
145 ms
html5placeholder.jquery.min.js
216 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
176 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
180 ms
jquery.ui.position.min.js
185 ms
jquery.ui.menu.min.js
188 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.min.js
248 ms
toolbar.js
255 ms
jsapi
19 ms
amazon_linker.min.js
302 ms
jquery.form.js
191 ms
scripts.js
191 ms
bg.jpg
55 ms
search.jpg
67 ms
search-go.jpg
63 ms
rssfeeds.jpg
64 ms
sidebarbg.jpg
55 ms
791364_beagle.jpg
108 ms
7-PetSafe-PIF-300_262x300.jpg
191 ms
graphic.jpg
114 ms
article.jpg
111 ms
arrow_up.png
102 ms
close-search.png
95 ms
192 ms
wirelesspetfencereview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
wirelesspetfencereview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
wirelesspetfencereview.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wirelesspetfencereview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wirelesspetfencereview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wirelesspetfencereview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wireless Pet Fence Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: