Tools & Wizards About Us
wirescreen.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

wirescreen.org

Window Wire Screen with Aluminum, Fiberglass and Plastic Screening

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

129 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

245 ms

wirescreen.org screenshot

About Website

Visit wirescreen.org now to see the best up-to-date Wire Screen content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wirescreen.org

Window wire screen covers fiberglass screen, aluminum window screen and stainless steel window screen. Wire screen installation steps are available in wirescreen.org.

Visit wirescreen.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Wirescreen.org page load time and found that the first response time was 129 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wirescreen.org performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.45

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wirescreen.org

129 ms

wirescreen.org

264 ms

www.wirescreen.org

289 ms

owl.carousel.css

61 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.css

123 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Wirescreen.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (426 ms) belongs to the original domain Wirescreen.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.4 kB (3%)

Content Size

825.3 kB

After Optimization

799.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wirescreen.org main page is 825.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 582.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 22.9 kB

  • Original 29.1 kB
  • After minification 28.3 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 734 B

  • Original 582.0 kB
  • After minification 581.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wire Screen images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 632 B

  • Original 161.9 kB
  • After minification 161.9 kB
  • After compression 161.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 52.2 kB
  • After minification 52.2 kB
  • After compression 51.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wirescreen.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (66%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wire Screen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wirescreen.org

wirescreen.org

129 ms

wirescreen.org

wirescreen.org

264 ms

www.wirescreen.org

www.wirescreen.org

289 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

61 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.css

jquery.mmenu.all.css

123 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

184 ms

settings.css

settings.css

185 ms

slider.css

slider.css

187 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

179 ms

style.css

style.css

246 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

189 ms

sitemap.css

sitemap.css

239 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

241 ms

pup.min.js

pup.min.js

244 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

312 ms

myslider.js

myslider.js

245 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

369 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

384 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

361 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

323 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

305 ms

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

368 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

396 ms

jquery.mmenu.min.all.js

jquery.mmenu.min.all.js

396 ms

main.js

main.js

421 ms

html5.js

html5.js

426 ms

bg3.jpg

bg3.jpg

165 ms

logo.png

logo.png

283 ms

fiberglass-window-screen-flame-resistance.jpg

fiberglass-window-screen-flame-resistance.jpg

292 ms

pet-screen-tear-resistance.jpg

pet-screen-tear-resistance.jpg

360 ms

galvanized-window-screen-finger.jpg

galvanized-window-screen-finger.jpg

286 ms

plain-weave-ss-roll.jpg

plain-weave-ss-roll.jpg

283 ms

rectangle-aluminum-alloy-security-screen.jpg

rectangle-aluminum-alloy-security-screen.jpg

286 ms

silver-white-molybdenum-mesh.jpg

silver-white-molybdenum-mesh.jpg

283 ms

multi-layer-filter-disc.jpg

multi-layer-filter-disc.jpg

299 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

329 ms

Accessibility Review

wirescreen.org accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wirescreen.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

wirescreen.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wirescreen.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wirescreen.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wirescreen.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wire Screen. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: