2.9 sec in total
305 ms
2.4 sec
147 ms
Click here to check amazing Wirl content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wirl.info
Visit wirl.infoWe analyzed Wirl.info page load time and found that the first response time was 305 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
wirl.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value5.6 s
54/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.245
51/100
15%
Value4.3 s
85/100
10%
305 ms
937 ms
346 ms
33 ms
311 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Wirl.info, 24% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (937 ms) belongs to the original domain Wirl.info.
Page size can be reduced by 442.4 kB (79%)
558.3 kB
115.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Wirl.info main page is 558.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 286.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 140.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 242.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wirl.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 242.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (89%)
19
2
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wirl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wirl.info
305 ms
wirl.info
937 ms
style.min.css
346 ms
css
33 ms
lightslider.min.css
311 ms
boxicons.min.css
502 ms
style.css
513 ms
ogma-blog-responsive.css
318 ms
ogma-blog-preloader.css
320 ms
jquery.min.js
614 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
428 ms
core.min.js
534 ms
tabs.min.js
453 ms
jquery.cookie.js
538 ms
lightslider.min.js
559 ms
jquery.marquee.js
607 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
745 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.min.js
747 ms
navigation.js
747 ms
main-scripts.js
747 ms
keyboard-accessibility.js
747 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
81 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf
95 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
109 ms
boxicons.woff
404 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmRTM.ttf
110 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImRTM.ttf
109 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmRTM.ttf
109 ms
XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshRTM.ttf
109 ms
wirl.info accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
wirl.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wirl.info SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ID
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wirl.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Wirl.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wirl.info
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wirl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: