Tools & Wizards About Us
wishtrip.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 57

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

wishtrip.net

WishTrip.Net – Online Hotel Booking, Resorts & Holiday Packages

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

480 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

272 ms

wishtrip.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wish Trip content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wishtrip.net

Find Best Deals on Hotels and Resorts Booking at Wishtrip. Book Cheap Customized Holiday Packages With Special Offers. Read Hotel Reviews And Browse.

Visit wishtrip.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Wishtrip.net page load time and found that the first response time was 480 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wishtrip.net performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.1 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.173

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wishtrip.net

480 ms

wishtrip.net

942 ms

matomo.js

80 ms

gtm.js

66 ms

booking.css

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Wishtrip.net, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Wishtrip.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 394.5 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wishtrip.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 912.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 27.5 kB

  • Original 34.2 kB
  • After minification 24.0 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.2 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 912.0 kB
  • After minification 907.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wish Trip images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 281.0 kB

  • Original 375.2 kB
  • After minification 304.0 kB
  • After compression 94.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 281.0 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 81.2 kB

  • Original 110.9 kB
  • After minification 87.2 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wishtrip.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 81.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (49%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wish Trip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wishtrip.net

wishtrip.net

480 ms

wishtrip.net

wishtrip.net

942 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

80 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

66 ms

booking.css

booking.css

185 ms

camera.css

camera.css

369 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

554 ms

style.css

style.css

753 ms

all.css

all.css

46 ms

css

css

38 ms

folio-gallery.css

folio-gallery.css

754 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

751 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

763 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

958 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

736 ms

script.js

script.js

921 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

937 ms

jquery.ui.totop.js

jquery.ui.totop.js

938 ms

jquery.equalheights.js

jquery.equalheights.js

940 ms

jquery.mobilemenu.js

jquery.mobilemenu.js

950 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

1104 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1122 ms

camera.js

camera.js

1312 ms

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

1128 ms

booking.js

booking.js

1139 ms

js

js

72 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

968 ms

reset.css

reset.css

539 ms

skeleton.css

skeleton.css

559 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

567 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

578 ms

css

css

18 ms

css

css

24 ms

css

css

24 ms

css

css

25 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js

185 ms

jquery.fancyform.js

jquery.fancyform.js

193 ms

jquery.placeholder.js

jquery.placeholder.js

188 ms

regula.js

regula.js

189 ms

log.js

log.js

413 ms

05.jpg

05.jpg

369 ms

04.jpg

04.jpg

198 ms

06.jpg

06.jpg

376 ms

07.jpg

07.jpg

377 ms

09.jpg

09.jpg

380 ms

08.jpg

08.jpg

373 ms

hdban4.png

hdban4.png

384 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

553 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

560 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

563 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

565 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

568 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

576 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

736 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

746 ms

9.jpg

9.jpg

750 ms

hdban5.png

hdban5.png

752 ms

hdban6.png

hdban6.png

757 ms

photo.jpg

photo.jpg

767 ms

photo1.jpg

photo1.jpg

921 ms

facebook-logo.png

facebook-logo.png

932 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

68 ms

menu_bg.png

menu_bg.png

907 ms

mebu_sep.png

mebu_sep.png

908 ms

quotes.png

quotes.png

914 ms

prevnext.png

prevnext.png

787 ms

camera-loader.gif

camera-loader.gif

933 ms

slide_1.jpg

slide_1.jpg

1320 ms

totop.png

totop.png

954 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

22 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

24 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

38 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

956 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

963 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

41 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

37 ms

EYq2maBOwqRW9P1SQ83LShRMWw.ttf

EYq2maBOwqRW9P1SQ83LShRMWw.ttf

36 ms

BngRUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbCGwRg.ttf

BngRUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbCGwRg.ttf

52 ms

slide_6.jpg

slide_6.jpg

554 ms

Accessibility Review

wishtrip.net accessibility score

57

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

wishtrip.net best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

wishtrip.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wishtrip.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wishtrip.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wishtrip.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wish Trip. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: