Report Summary

  • 8

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

wiwar.pl

Wiwar.pl

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

647 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

356 ms

wiwar.pl screenshot

About Website

Visit wiwar.pl now to see the best up-to-date Wiwar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wiwar.pl

Visit wiwar.pl

Key Findings

We analyzed Wiwar.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 647 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wiwar.pl performance score

8

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value12.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.6 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,570 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.385

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wiwar.pl

647 ms

css

26 ms

font-awesome.min.css

134 ms

awards.css

241 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

248 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Wiwar.pl, 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Wiwar.pl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 381.5 kB (47%)

Content Size

816.5 kB

After Optimization

435.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Wiwar.pl main page is 816.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 380.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 19.6 kB
  • After minification 14.6 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 52.9 kB

  • Original 380.7 kB
  • After minification 327.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wiwar needs image optimization as it can save up to 52.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 159.2 kB

  • Original 238.1 kB
  • After minification 233.4 kB
  • After compression 78.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 159.2 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 153.1 kB

  • Original 178.2 kB
  • After minification 139.8 kB
  • After compression 25.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wiwar.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 153.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (35%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wiwar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wiwar.pl accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wiwar.pl best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

wiwar.pl SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PL

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wiwar.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Wiwar.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wiwar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: