19.5 sec in total
317 ms
18.7 sec
524 ms
Visit wiza.ug now to see the best up-to-date Wiza content for Uganda and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wiza.ug
Wiza Limited is Uganda’s leading System Design, Mobile apps design, SEO & website design company in Kampala -Uganda
Visit wiza.ugWe analyzed Wiza.ug page load time and found that the first response time was 317 ms and then it took 19.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
wiza.ug performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.0 s
0/100
10%
Value17.7 s
0/100
25%
Value21.7 s
0/100
10%
Value1,070 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.969
2/100
15%
Value23.5 s
1/100
10%
317 ms
16490 ms
31 ms
67 ms
434 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Wiza.ug, 13% (12 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (16.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Wiza.ug.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (62%)
2.2 MB
829.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Wiza.ug main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 985.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 155.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 514 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wiza images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 368.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 368.9 kB or 45% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 806.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wiza.ug needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 806.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 75 (91%)
82
7
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wiza. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wiza.ug
317 ms
wiza.ug
16490 ms
css
31 ms
js
67 ms
style.min.css
434 ms
view.css
299 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
308 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
305 ms
styles.css
306 ms
dashicons.min.css
550 ms
frontend.min.css
395 ms
frontend.min.css
403 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
699 ms
swiper.min.css
403 ms
post-3873.css
495 ms
all.min.css
702 ms
v4-shims.min.css
502 ms
global.css
539 ms
post-10.css
692 ms
css
28 ms
bootstrap.min.css
798 ms
font-awesome.min.css
648 ms
animate.css
656 ms
iconfont.css
757 ms
isotope.css
765 ms
magnific-popup.css
791 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
795 ms
owl.theme.default.min.css
795 ms
woocommerce.css
867 ms
blog.css
874 ms
gutenberg-custom.css
890 ms
master.css
992 ms
style.css
779 ms
general.min.css
780 ms
css
18 ms
jetpack.css
969 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
867 ms
v4-shims.min.js
874 ms
jquery.min.js
983 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
885 ms
wpstg-blank-loader.js
1000 ms
e-202410.js
23 ms
animations.min.css
977 ms
index.js
858 ms
index.js
850 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
941 ms
bootstrap.min.js
944 ms
popper.min.js
862 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
853 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
852 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
823 ms
jquery-mixtub.js
838 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
819 ms
script.js
781 ms
general.min.js
773 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
669 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
685 ms
waypoints.min.js
727 ms
core.min.js
724 ms
frontend.min.js
724 ms
elementor.js
668 ms
underscore.min.js
675 ms
wp-util.min.js
649 ms
frontend.min.js
723 ms
launcher.js
140 ms
gt.jpg
400 ms
font
67 ms
font
67 ms
iconfont.ttf
400 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
424 ms
default
221 ms
wizalogo1.png
306 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
303 ms
5f8da54f1820124f91978708
197 ms
details
241 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
58 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
111 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
99 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
99 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
289 ms
twk-main.js
111 ms
twk-vendor.js
64 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
75 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
87 ms
twk-runtime.js
96 ms
twk-app.js
170 ms
minified.js
76 ms
widget.js
53 ms
a3.png
161 ms
font
32 ms
wiza.ug accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wiza.ug best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
wiza.ug SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wiza.ug can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wiza.ug main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wiza.ug
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wiza. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: