Tools & Wizards About Us
wj1968.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

wj1968.com

www丝瓜视频_xfb4cc丝瓜app芭乐app_xy14app丝瓜ios版下载_草丝瓜app官网下载地址

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

404 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

239 ms

wj1968.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wj 1968 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wj1968.com

欢迎访问NJAV导航【www.njav.net】!www丝瓜视频,xfb4cc丝瓜app芭乐app,xy14app丝瓜ios版下载,草丝瓜app官网下载地址,片源丰富、内容全面,注意自我保护,适度观看影、合理安排时间、享受健康生活!

Visit wj1968.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wj1968.com page load time and found that the first response time was 404 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wj1968.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wj1968.com

404 ms

www.wj1968.com

403 ms

xx.js

70 ms

hm.js

1445 ms

xx.js

123 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Wj1968.com, 40% (4 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com and 20% (2 requests) were made to 0. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Hm.baidu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 kB (33%)

Content Size

4.2 kB

After Optimization

2.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Wj1968.com main page is 4.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 2.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.0 kB or 48% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 370 B

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 370 B or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (57%)

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wj 1968. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wj1968.com

wj1968.com

404 ms

www.wj1968.com

www.wj1968.com

403 ms

xx.js

xx.js

70 ms

hm.js

hm.js

1445 ms

xx.js

xx.js

123 ms

403.php

403.php

127 ms

hm.js

hm.js

1458 ms

push.js

push.js

765 ms

hm.gif

hm.gif

328 ms

hm.gif

hm.gif

329 ms

Accessibility Review

wj1968.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

wj1968.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

wj1968.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wj1968.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wj1968.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wj1968.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wj 1968. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: