9 sec in total
438 ms
8 sec
599 ms
Welcome to woe.com.au homepage info - get ready to check Woe best content right away, or after learning these important things about woe.com.au
Total Computer Technology has been working in the IT industry for over 20 years and has built a solid reputation for handling all facets of IT support clients.
Visit woe.com.auWe analyzed Woe.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 438 ms and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
woe.com.au performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value14.3 s
0/100
25%
Value17.5 s
0/100
10%
Value1,120 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
438 ms
1154 ms
284 ms
516 ms
654 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Woe.com.au, 5% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) relates to the external source Tct.com.au.
Page size can be reduced by 155.8 kB (7%)
2.3 MB
2.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Woe.com.au main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 142.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Woe images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 0 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Woe.com.au has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 78 (80%)
97
19
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Woe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 79 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
tct.com.au
438 ms
tct.com.au
1154 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
284 ms
jquery.min.js
516 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
654 ms
Test-3.png
1298 ms
accordion-custom.js
668 ms
accordion.js
681 ms
core.min.js
712 ms
accordion.min.js
719 ms
menu.min.js
845 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
899 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
905 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
938 ms
dom-ready.min.js
945 ms
hooks.min.js
1061 ms
i18n.min.js
1163 ms
a11y.min.js
1186 ms
autocomplete.min.js
1187 ms
controlgroup.min.js
1188 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
1278 ms
button.min.js
1419 ms
datepicker.min.js
1418 ms
mouse.min.js
1423 ms
resizable.min.js
1455 ms
draggable.min.js
1500 ms
dialog.min.js
1514 ms
droppable.min.js
1616 ms
progressbar.min.js
1621 ms
selectable.min.js
1623 ms
sortable.min.js
1651 ms
slider.min.js
1722 ms
spinner.min.js
1734 ms
tooltip.min.js
1833 ms
tabs.min.js
1861 ms
effect.min.js
1854 ms
effect-blind.min.js
1872 ms
api.js
37 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
1938 ms
effect-clip.min.js
1708 ms
effect-drop.min.js
1571 ms
effect-explode.min.js
1454 ms
effect-fade.min.js
1420 ms
effect-fold.min.js
1417 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
1450 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
1460 ms
effect-size.min.js
1427 ms
effect-scale.min.js
1394 ms
effect-shake.min.js
1402 ms
effect-slide.min.js
1374 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
1433 ms
doubletaptogo.js
1339 ms
recaptcha__en.js
41 ms
modernizr.min.js
1312 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1341 ms
mixitup.js
1374 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
1387 ms
anchor
45 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
1327 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1400 ms
styles__ltr.css
3 ms
recaptcha__en.js
11 ms
GkjfOPLjH9yfCD_DOorHDjuniNue43U1N7O1wSFLKmc.js
44 ms
webworker.js
74 ms
logo_48.png
28 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
55 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
57 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
61 ms
recaptcha__en.js
48 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
1292 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1303 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1340 ms
waypoints.min.js
1338 ms
skrollr.js
1332 ms
jquery.multiscroll.min.js
1400 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
1342 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
1349 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1393 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1376 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1342 ms
imagesloaded.js
1400 ms
jquery.event.move.js
1341 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
1333 ms
default_dynamic.js
1373 ms
default.min.js
1756 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1349 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1412 ms
lazyload.min.js
1348 ms
tct-home-background.jpeg
3783 ms
TCT-slider-background.jpeg
3636 ms
TCT-LOGO-HD-Website.png
261 ms
logo.png
268 ms
logo_black.png
255 ms
Total-computer-technology-home-slider.jpeg
1964 ms
TCT-IT-support-Sydney-Melbourne.jpeg
1072 ms
IT-Support.jpg
1623 ms
The-Cloud.jpg
1222 ms
Communications.jpg
2328 ms
Procurement.jpg
2194 ms
21FEB24.jpg
2101 ms
16FEB24.jpg
2355 ms
pay-ransom.jpg
2753 ms
woe.com.au accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
woe.com.au best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
woe.com.au SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Woe.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Woe.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
woe.com.au
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Woe. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: