Tools & Wizards About Us
wolfpaw.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

wolfpaw.com

Wolfpaw Data Centres Corporate Network Co-Location and Connectivity

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

145 ms

Resources Loaded

685 ms

Page Rendered

175 ms

wolfpaw.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wolfpaw content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wolfpaw.com

High bandwidth enterprise grade Network co-location services, and corporate connectivity solutions for businesses across Canada and the Globe.

Visit wolfpaw.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wolfpaw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 860 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wolfpaw.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,160 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.274

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.4 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wolfpaw.com

145 ms

template_css.css

105 ms

mainmenu.css

107 ms

stylechanger.js

108 ms

1x1.gif

102 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Wolfpaw.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (411 ms) belongs to the original domain Wolfpaw.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 37.3 kB (22%)

Content Size

173.1 kB

After Optimization

135.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wolfpaw.com main page is 173.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 145.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 10.1 kB
  • After minification 8.7 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 14.8 kB

  • Original 145.3 kB
  • After minification 130.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wolfpaw images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 621 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 16.1 kB
  • After minification 9.5 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wolfpaw.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (24%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wolfpaw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wolfpaw.com

wolfpaw.com

145 ms

template_css.css

template_css.css

105 ms

mainmenu.css

mainmenu.css

107 ms

stylechanger.js

stylechanger.js

108 ms

1x1.gif

1x1.gif

102 ms

topbg.png

topbg.png

205 ms

callus.png

callus.png

158 ms

tilemmenu.gif

tilemmenu.gif

106 ms

css_small.gif

css_small.gif

108 ms

css_reset.gif

css_reset.gif

110 ms

css_large.gif

css_large.gif

206 ms

splashds.gif

splashds.gif

207 ms

splash2.gif

splash2.gif

319 ms

hiqual1.png

hiqual1.png

267 ms

hiqual2.png

hiqual2.png

261 ms

cable-ethernet-btn.png

cable-ethernet-btn.png

308 ms

co-location-btn.png

co-location-btn.png

310 ms

connectivity-btn.png

connectivity-btn.png

310 ms

divblue.gif

divblue.gif

366 ms

mainbg.gif

mainbg.gif

373 ms

15yrs.gif

15yrs.gif

408 ms

netstat.gif

netstat.gif

411 ms

Accessibility Review

wolfpaw.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

wolfpaw.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

wolfpaw.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wolfpaw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wolfpaw.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

wolfpaw.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wolfpaw. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: