812 ms in total
28 ms
526 ms
258 ms
Click here to check amazing WolfSSL content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wolfssl.com
Visit wolfssl.comWe analyzed Wolfssl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 784 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
wolfssl.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value5.9 s
48/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.373
28/100
15%
Value10.0 s
27/100
10%
28 ms
66 ms
123 ms
18 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Wolfssl.com, 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (146 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 753.9 kB (65%)
1.2 MB
408.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Wolfssl.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 515.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, WolfSSL needs image optimization as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 406.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 406.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 212.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wolfssl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 212.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (75%)
56
14
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WolfSSL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wolfssl.com
28 ms
www.wolfssl.com
66 ms
js
123 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
18 ms
style.min.css
25 ms
classic-themes.min.css
23 ms
jquery.socialfeed.css
23 ms
front-flex.min.css
21 ms
font-awesome.min.css
21 ms
css
46 ms
css
67 ms
css
118 ms
css
66 ms
css
68 ms
css
69 ms
css
68 ms
css
80 ms
owl.carousel.css
21 ms
tooltipster.bundle.css
30 ms
smls-frontend-style.css
31 ms
smls-responsive.css
27 ms
style.min.css
28 ms
north-icons.min.css
27 ms
flexslider.min.css
29 ms
css
82 ms
style.css
34 ms
default.css
31 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
32 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
32 ms
codebird.js
32 ms
doT.min.js
34 ms
moment.min.js
35 ms
jquery.socialfeed.js
34 ms
owl.carousel.js
35 ms
tooltipster.bundle.js
38 ms
smls-frontend-script.js
35 ms
iframeResizer.min.js
37 ms
so-css-siteorigin-north.css
35 ms
sow-image-default-17bc2272b535-78.css
36 ms
sow-image-default-d6014b76747a-78.css
36 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
37 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
39 ms
north.min.js
37 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.min.js
38 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
37 ms
japan-site.png
109 ms
cropped-wolfssl_logo_300px.png
66 ms
FIPS-140-3-1-300x169.png
68 ms
wolf_howling-1.png
72 ms
wolfboot_intel_whitepaper_thumbnail-226x300.png
67 ms
TLS13-now-avail.png
69 ms
x.png
68 ms
facebook-icon.png
71 ms
github-icon.png
71 ms
linkedin_50_50.png
71 ms
flickr-icon.png
71 ms
madeInUsa_100px.png
71 ms
tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAA.ttf
146 ms
SlGVmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXkHNSaA.ttf
38 ms
SlGWmQWMvZQIdix7AFxXmMh3eDs1Yg.ttf
38 ms
north-icons.ttf
11 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
60 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
60 ms
wolfssl.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
wolfssl.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
wolfssl.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wolfssl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wolfssl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wolfssl.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WolfSSL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: