Tools & Wizards About Us
wolftechnical.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

wolftechnical.com

Wolf Technical Services | Welcome to Wolf Technical Services

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

69 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

168 ms

wolftechnical.com screenshot

About Website

Visit wolftechnical.com now to see the best up-to-date Wolf Technical content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wolftechnical.com

Wolf Technical Services is dedicated to engineering excellence. Discover more about our experience in forensics, graphics, military and commercial design.

Visit wolftechnical.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wolftechnical.com page load time and found that the first response time was 69 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wolftechnical.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.455

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wolftechnical.com

69 ms

www.wolftechnical.com

573 ms

gtm.js

92 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

71 ms

layerslider.css

129 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Wolftechnical.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Static.addtoany.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (573 ms) belongs to the original domain Wolftechnical.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 639.8 kB (17%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wolftechnical.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 55.2 kB

  • Original 70.1 kB
  • After minification 69.0 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 99.1 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wolf Technical images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 291.4 kB

  • Original 495.9 kB
  • After minification 493.1 kB
  • After compression 204.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 291.4 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 194.1 kB

  • Original 229.9 kB
  • After minification 204.6 kB
  • After compression 35.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wolftechnical.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 194.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (67%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wolf Technical. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wolftechnical.com

wolftechnical.com

69 ms

www.wolftechnical.com

www.wolftechnical.com

573 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

92 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

71 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

129 ms

css

css

33 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

156 ms

index.css

index.css

100 ms

styles.css

styles.css

101 ms

page-list.css

page-list.css

97 ms

front-legacy.css

front-legacy.css

99 ms

style.css

style.css

180 ms

css

css

68 ms

core.css

core.css

127 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

41 ms

style.css

style.css

128 ms

mobilenav.css

mobilenav.css

131 ms

default.css

default.css

157 ms

addtoany.min.css

addtoany.min.css

157 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

213 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

233 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

182 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

248 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

232 ms

page.js

page.js

36 ms

addtoany.min.js

addtoany.min.js

205 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

209 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

246 ms

jquery.theme-main.min.js

jquery.theme-main.min.js

247 ms

jquery.fitvids.min.js

jquery.fitvids.min.js

269 ms

mobilenav.min.js

mobilenav.min.js

268 ms

up_loader.1.1.0.js

up_loader.1.1.0.js

38 ms

index.js

index.js

244 ms

index.js

index.js

243 ms

styling.min.js

styling.min.js

244 ms

css

css

17 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

87 ms

logo.png

logo.png

85 ms

fader1.jpg

fader1.jpg

84 ms

blue-bg.png

blue-bg.png

83 ms

black-bar.png

black-bar.png

84 ms

home2.jpg

home2.jpg

116 ms

mc-vs-car-slider.png

mc-vs-car-slider.png

244 ms

home4.jpg

home4.jpg

165 ms

visibility-fog-slider2.png

visibility-fog-slider2.png

217 ms

co1.png

co1.png

115 ms

co2.png

co2.png

114 ms

co3.png

co3.png

164 ms

co4.png

co4.png

163 ms

home-bg.jpg

home-bg.jpg

127 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7wnU6AFw.woff

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7wnU6AFw.woff

76 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyLPYZvgw.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyLPYZvgw.woff

124 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyLPYZvgw.woff

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyLPYZvgw.woff

130 ms

vantage-icons.woff

vantage-icons.woff

163 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

74 ms

wt.php

wt.php

86 ms

sm.25.html

sm.25.html

94 ms

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

eso.D0Uc7kY6.js

94 ms

collect

collect

62 ms

skin.css

skin.css

33 ms

webtraxs.php

webtraxs.php

132 ms

js

js

49 ms

Accessibility Review

wolftechnical.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

wolftechnical.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wolftechnical.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wolftechnical.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wolftechnical.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wolftechnical.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wolf Technical. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: