Tools & Wizards About Us
wolftracker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

wolftracker.com

Yellowstone Wolf Watching Vacation Tours & Guides

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

429 ms

Resources Loaded

866 ms

Page Rendered

644 ms

wolftracker.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wolf Tracker content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wolftracker.com

Information for watching wolves in Yellowstone Park including tours, guided trips, and other services

Visit wolftracker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wolftracker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 429 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wolftracker.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wolftracker.com

429 ms

lebkgnd.jpg

199 ms

track2.gif

133 ms

track3.jpg

196 ms

Wolf_Walking_Geoff_Darr2.jpg

517 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Wolftracker.com, 21% (7 requests) were made to Static.tacdn.com and 15% (5 requests) were made to Tripadvisor.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (517 ms) belongs to the original domain Wolftracker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 104.0 kB (26%)

Content Size

406.3 kB

After Optimization

302.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wolftracker.com main page is 406.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 331.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 27.6 kB

  • Original 34.3 kB
  • After minification 30.3 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 45.4 kB

  • Original 331.9 kB
  • After minification 286.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wolf Tracker needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

  • Original 17.8 kB
  • After minification 17.8 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 22.3 kB
  • After minification 17.9 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wolftracker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (17%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wolf Tracker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wolftracker.com

wolftracker.com

429 ms

lebkgnd.jpg

lebkgnd.jpg

199 ms

track2.gif

track2.gif

133 ms

track3.jpg

track3.jpg

196 ms

Wolf_Walking_Geoff_Darr2.jpg

Wolf_Walking_Geoff_Darr2.jpg

517 ms

aleabul1.gif

aleabul1.gif

135 ms

misty_wolf_NV.JPG

misty_wolf_NV.JPG

409 ms

39longframe.jpg

39longframe.jpg

292 ms

150_logo-11900-2.png

150_logo-11900-2.png

29 ms

swan.jpg

swan.jpg

306 ms

alpha21.JPG

alpha21.JPG

307 ms

DCwolf2.jpg

DCwolf2.jpg

237 ms

317 ms

ice_man_cometh.jpg

ice_man_cometh.jpg

369 ms

LindaThurston.jpg

LindaThurston.jpg

432 ms

Track4.JPG

Track4.JPG

371 ms

TWSlogo4.gif

TWSlogo4.gif

463 ms

aleabul1.gif

aleabul1.gif

464 ms

wejs

wejs

66 ms

wejs

wejs

43 ms

WidgetEmbed-certificateOfExcellence

WidgetEmbed-certificateOfExcellence

20 ms

cdswidCOE-v21462574883a.css%20%27%29%3B

cdswidCOE-v21462574883a.css%20%27%29%3B

2 ms

cdswidFRR-v23865805545a.css%20%27%29%3B

cdswidFRR-v23865805545a.css%20%27%29%3B

3 ms

cdswidgets_min-c-v23892882724a.js

cdswidgets_min-c-v23892882724a.js

39 ms

cdswidCOE-v21462574883a.css

cdswidCOE-v21462574883a.css

37 ms

cdswidFRR-v23865805545a.css

cdswidFRR-v23865805545a.css

38 ms

WidgetEmbed-selfserveprop

WidgetEmbed-selfserveprop

26 ms

cdswidSSP-v2414594452a.css%20%27%29%3B

cdswidSSP-v2414594452a.css%20%27%29%3B

5 ms

cdswidgets_m-c-v2102084671a.js

cdswidgets_m-c-v2102084671a.js

6 ms

cdswidSSP-v2414594452a.css

cdswidSSP-v2414594452a.css

4 ms

CoE2015_WidgetAsset-14348-2.png

CoE2015_WidgetAsset-14348-2.png

22 ms

BackgroundRuleBlack.gif

BackgroundRuleBlack.gif

20 ms

s5.0.gif

s5.0.gif

10 ms

150_logo-11900-2.png

150_logo-11900-2.png

8 ms

Accessibility Review

wolftracker.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

High

Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wolftracker.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wolftracker.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wolftracker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wolftracker.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

wolftracker.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wolf Tracker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: