Tools & Wizards About Us
womenstotalcare.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

womenstotalcare.org

Womens Total Care – Just another WordPress site

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

424 ms

Resources Loaded

678 ms

Page Rendered

82 ms

womenstotalcare.org screenshot

About Website

Visit womenstotalcare.org now to see the best up-to-date Womens Total Care content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about womenstotalcare.org

Visit womenstotalcare.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Womenstotalcare.org page load time and found that the first response time was 424 ms and then it took 760 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

womenstotalcare.org performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

90/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

womenstotalcare.org

424 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

108 ms

css

35 ms

genericons.css

142 ms

style.css

178 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Womenstotalcare.org, 67% (8 requests) were made to S640129320.onlinehome.us and 17% (2 requests) were made to 2.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (424 ms) belongs to the original domain Womenstotalcare.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 7.8 kB (66%)

Content Size

11.8 kB

After Optimization

4.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Womenstotalcare.org main page is 11.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 10.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 10.7 kB
  • After minification 10.1 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 342 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 749 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Womens Total Care needs image optimization as it can save up to 342 B or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Womens Total Care. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

womenstotalcare.org

womenstotalcare.org

424 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

108 ms

css

css

35 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

142 ms

style.css

style.css

178 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

184 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

200 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

181 ms

functions.js

functions.js

182 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

184 ms

8d077fcb831834dd79688b7d623eb94c

8d077fcb831834dd79688b7d623eb94c

7 ms

8d077fcb831834dd79688b7d623eb94c

8d077fcb831834dd79688b7d623eb94c

56 ms

Accessibility Review

womenstotalcare.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

womenstotalcare.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

womenstotalcare.org SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Womenstotalcare.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Womenstotalcare.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

womenstotalcare.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Womens Total Care. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: