Tools & Wizards About Us
woodmontstation.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

woodmontstation.com

Apartments in Cranford NJ | Woodmont Station at Cranford

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

40 ms

Resources Loaded

786 ms

Page Rendered

411 ms

woodmontstation.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Woodmont Station content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about woodmontstation.com

Woodmont Station features luxury one, two, and three bedroom apartment homes with competitive amenities just moments from Union.

Visit woodmontstation.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Woodmontstation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 40 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

woodmontstation.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

woodmontstation.com

40 ms

www.woodmontstation.com

123 ms

www.woodmontstation.com

203 ms

jquery.min.js

39 ms

ajax.js

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Woodmontstation.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Spxeastwebfarm7.spherexx.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Textus.rentcafe.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (255 ms) relates to the external source Spxeastwebfarm7.spherexx.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 67.0 kB (22%)

Content Size

306.9 kB

After Optimization

239.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Woodmontstation.com main page is 306.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 115.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 41.9 kB

  • Original 54.6 kB
  • After minification 48.8 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 106.8 kB
  • After minification 100.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Woodmont Station images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 115.2 kB
  • After minification 115.1 kB
  • After compression 101.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 30.3 kB
  • After minification 30.3 kB
  • After compression 24.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Woodmontstation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (67%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Woodmont Station. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

woodmontstation.com

woodmontstation.com

40 ms

www.woodmontstation.com

www.woodmontstation.com

123 ms

www.woodmontstation.com

www.woodmontstation.com

203 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

39 ms

ajax.js

ajax.js

52 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

54 ms

responsive.min.js

responsive.min.js

54 ms

runfirstfunctions.js

runfirstfunctions.js

53 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

64 ms

validate.js

validate.js

56 ms

setvalue.js

setvalue.js

58 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

56 ms

spotlight.js

spotlight.js

56 ms

respond.js

respond.js

54 ms

jquery.accordion.min.js

jquery.accordion.min.js

64 ms

jquery.focuspoint.min.js

jquery.focuspoint.min.js

64 ms

jquery.fluidImage.min.js

jquery.fluidImage.min.js

64 ms

jquery.resizeEnd.min.js

jquery.resizeEnd.min.js

63 ms

magnific.min.js

magnific.min.js

62 ms

jquery.backstretch.min.js

jquery.backstretch.min.js

75 ms

jquery.slicknav.js

jquery.slicknav.js

66 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

66 ms

inc_default.js

inc_default.js

66 ms

style-atf.min.css

style-atf.min.css

69 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

67 ms

style-responsive.min.css

style-responsive.min.css

72 ms

style-colors.css.asp

style-colors.css.asp

94 ms

element.js

element.js

78 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

62 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

69 ms

TextUsWidget.js

TextUsWidget.js

79 ms

slick.css

slick.css

71 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

73 ms

magnific.css

magnific.css

73 ms

slicknav.css

slicknav.css

70 ms

accordion.css

accordion.css

72 ms

fa-brands.min.css

fa-brands.min.css

75 ms

iwk3nfg.css

iwk3nfg.css

26 ms

p.css

p.css

28 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

198 ms

dynamic.asp

dynamic.asp

255 ms

dynamic.asp

dynamic.asp

138 ms

dynamic.asp

dynamic.asp

124 ms

dynamic.asp

dynamic.asp

122 ms

dynamic.asp

dynamic.asp

128 ms

dynamic.asp

dynamic.asp

128 ms

dynamic.asp

dynamic.asp

130 ms

loading-spinner.png

loading-spinner.png

19 ms

aspcaptcha_distort.asp

aspcaptcha_distort.asp

73 ms

review-thumbs-up-circle.png

review-thumbs-up-circle.png

18 ms

woodmont-w.png

woodmont-w.png

18 ms

logo_hand.png

logo_hand.png

33 ms

logo_eho.png

logo_eho.png

18 ms

icon_plus_hover.jpg

icon_plus_hover.jpg

72 ms

icon_plus_mobile.jpg

icon_plus_mobile.jpg

73 ms

menu-open.png

menu-open.png

40 ms

CartoGothicStd-Book-webfont.woff

CartoGothicStd-Book-webfont.woff

35 ms

CartoGothicStd-Bold-webfont.woff

CartoGothicStd-Bold-webfont.woff

50 ms

Quicksand_Book-webfont.woff

Quicksand_Book-webfont.woff

71 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

87 ms

TextUsWidget.css

TextUsWidget.css

19 ms

Accessibility Review

woodmontstation.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

woodmontstation.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

woodmontstation.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Woodmontstation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Woodmontstation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

woodmontstation.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Woodmont Station. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: