Tools & Wizards About Us
word.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

word.com

Merriam-Webster: America's Most Trusted Dictionary

Page Load Speed

350 ms in total

First Response

28 ms

Resources Loaded

322 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

word.com screenshot

About Website

Visit word.com now to see the best up-to-date Word content for South Korea and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about word.com

Find definitions for over 300,000 words from the most authoritative English dictionary. Continuously updated with new words and meanings.

Visit word.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Word.com page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 322 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

word.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,290 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value41.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

word.com

28 ms

www.merriam-webster.com

59 ms

bundle.es5.min.js

113 ms

at.js

31 ms

ads.min.js

147 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Word.com, 67% (14 requests) were made to Merriam-webster.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (203 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 276.8 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

758.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Word.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 466.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 221.3 kB

  • Original 270.1 kB
  • After minification 210.8 kB
  • After compression 48.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 59.3 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 221.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 55.1 kB

  • Original 466.9 kB
  • After minification 411.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Word needs image optimization as it can save up to 55.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 436 B

  • Original 243.3 kB
  • After minification 243.3 kB
  • After compression 242.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 55.0 kB
  • After minification 55.0 kB
  • After compression 55.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Word.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (37%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Word. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

word.com

word.com

28 ms

www.merriam-webster.com

www.merriam-webster.com

59 ms

bundle.es5.min.js

bundle.es5.min.js

113 ms

at.js

at.js

31 ms

ads.min.js

ads.min.js

147 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

171 ms

js

js

203 ms

script.manual.js

script.manual.js

123 ms

style-home-redesign.1b81f0dffcc3a88e4d9c.css

style-home-redesign.1b81f0dffcc3a88e4d9c.css

30 ms

jwplayer.js

jwplayer.js

116 ms

js-home-redesign.76c3b55e6d705e7ef3ef.js

js-home-redesign.76c3b55e6d705e7ef3ef.js

119 ms

link-icon.svg

link-icon.svg

51 ms

audio-pron.svg

audio-pron.svg

49 ms

content-section-header-ellipsis-gold.svg

content-section-header-ellipsis-gold.svg

50 ms

wap-see-all-default.svg

wap-see-all-default.svg

52 ms

video-player.svg

video-player.svg

54 ms

open-link-icon.svg

open-link-icon.svg

55 ms

timetraveler-logo.svg

timetraveler-logo.svg

52 ms

app_mw_image_2x_updated.png

app_mw_image_2x_updated.png

57 ms

poadcast_word_image_updated1.png

poadcast_word_image_updated1.png

55 ms

rid

rid

49 ms

Accessibility Review

word.com accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[role] values are not valid

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

word.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

word.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Word.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Word.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

word.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Word. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: