1 sec in total
180 ms
803 ms
61 ms
Visit wordcount.org now to see the best up-to-date Wordcount content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wordcount.org
WORDCOUNT. An interactive presentation of the 86,800 most common words in the English language. By Jonathan J. Harris / Number27
Visit wordcount.orgWe analyzed Wordcount.org page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 864 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
wordcount.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value1.6 s
99/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
180 ms
321 ms
77 ms
301 ms
Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Wordcount.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (321 ms) belongs to the original domain Wordcount.org.
Page size can be reduced by 416 B (38%)
1.1 kB
673 B
In fact, the total size of Wordcount.org main page is 1.1 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 893 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 382 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 382 B or 43% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wordcount.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34 B or 17% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
2
2
The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wordcount. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
wordcount.org
180 ms
www.wordcount.org
321 ms
bodyText.css
77 ms
wordcount.gif
301 ms
wordcount.org accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
wordcount.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
wordcount.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wordcount.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wordcount.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
wordcount.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wordcount. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: