Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

wordfence.com

WordPress Security Plugin | Wordfence

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

149 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

568 ms

wordfence.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wordfence content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wordfence.com

The Wordfence WordPress security plugin provides free enterprise-class WordPress security, protecting your website from hacks and malware.

Visit wordfence.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wordfence.com page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wordfence.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value17.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,010 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wordfence.com

149 ms

www.wordfence.com

767 ms

fonts.css

332 ms

rockwell.css

69 ms

style.css

135 ms

Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Wordfence.com, 8% (8 requests) were made to and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (927 ms) belongs to the original domain Wordfence.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 940.8 kB (48%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Wordfence.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 804.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 173.8 kB

  • Original 242.2 kB
  • After minification 241.4 kB
  • After compression 68.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 173.8 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 473.0 kB
  • After minification 473.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wordfence images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 508.6 kB

  • Original 804.4 kB
  • After minification 780.2 kB
  • After compression 295.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 508.6 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 258.4 kB

  • Original 432.5 kB
  • After minification 404.9 kB
  • After compression 174.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wordfence.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 258.4 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (41%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

49

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wordfence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wordfence.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wordfence.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wordfence.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wordfence.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wordfence.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wordfence. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: