Tools & Wizards About Us
wordpool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

wordpool.com

Wordpool | Vocabulary notebook | Record, review, play.

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

706 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

172 ms

wordpool.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wordpool content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wordpool.com

Wordpool is the ultimate, online vocabulary notebook and games resource, putting the teacher and learner on the same page. Sign up for free!

Visit wordpool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wordpool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 706 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wordpool.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.066

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wordpool.com

706 ms

px.js

64 ms

px.js

66 ms

caf.js

48 ms

newcafv2.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Wordpool.com, 24% (4 requests) were made to D.rmgserving.com and 12% (2 requests) were made to C.rmgserving.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (706 ms) belongs to the original domain Wordpool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 39.3 kB (27%)

Content Size

147.9 kB

After Optimization

108.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Wordpool.com main page is 147.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 87.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 20.6 kB

  • Original 28.9 kB
  • After minification 28.6 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 31.1 kB
  • After minification 21.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wordpool needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 87.9 kB
  • After minification 83.0 kB
  • After compression 78.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (27%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wordpool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wordpool.com

wordpool.com

706 ms

px.js

px.js

64 ms

px.js

px.js

66 ms

caf.js

caf.js

48 ms

newcafv2.js

newcafv2.js

8 ms

body-bg.gif

body-bg.gif

46 ms

frst_arr.jpg

frst_arr.jpg

40 ms

caf.gif

caf.gif

39 ms

slave.html

slave.html

9 ms

domainpark.cgi

domainpark.cgi

196 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

10 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

5 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

7 ms

last_arr.jpg

last_arr.jpg

7 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

css

css

24 ms

pR0sBQVcY0JZc_ciXjFsKwAUTJOA6-irsSazDq377BE.ttf

pR0sBQVcY0JZc_ciXjFsKwAUTJOA6-irsSazDq377BE.ttf

8 ms

Accessibility Review

wordpool.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

wordpool.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

wordpool.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    >

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wordpool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wordpool.com main page’s claimed encoding is >. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

wordpool.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wordpool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: