Tools & Wizards About Us
wordrake.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

wordrake.com

Writing Assistant for Professionals | WordRake Editing Software

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

89 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

109 ms

wordrake.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wordrake.com homepage info - get ready to check Word Rake best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about wordrake.com

Polish your written communication with WordRake. It's editing software that offers automated in-line editing for professionals. Be confident with WordRake!

Visit wordrake.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wordrake.com page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wordrake.com performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,580 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.wordrake.com

89 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

39 ms

base-template.min.css

58 ms

module_31962941713_header.min.css

56 ms

js

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Wordrake.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Oss.maxcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Oss.maxcdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 31.1 kB (9%)

Content Size

352.1 kB

After Optimization

321.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wordrake.com main page is 352.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 164.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 31.3 kB
  • After minification 29.1 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2 B

  • Original 164.2 kB
  • After minification 164.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Word Rake images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 147.5 kB
  • After minification 147.5 kB
  • After compression 139.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 422 B

  • Original 9.1 kB
  • After minification 9.1 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wordrake.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (62%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Word Rake. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.wordrake.com

www.wordrake.com

89 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

jquery-1.7.1.js

39 ms

base-template.min.css

base-template.min.css

58 ms

module_31962941713_header.min.css

module_31962941713_header.min.css

56 ms

js

js

63 ms

lo.js

lo.js

29 ms

homepage.css

homepage.css

62 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

62 ms

owlcarousel.js

owlcarousel.js

60 ms

modal.js

modal.js

70 ms

script.js

script.js

68 ms

embed.js

embed.js

51 ms

project.js

project.js

78 ms

v2.js

v2.js

112 ms

3365575.js

3365575.js

132 ms

index.js

index.js

105 ms

html5.js

html5.js

125 ms

html5shiv.min.js

html5shiv.min.js

2622 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

2623 ms

menutrigger

menutrigger

247 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

75 ms

events.js

events.js

76 ms

logo.png

logo.png

69 ms

home-hero-bg.jpg

home-hero-bg.jpg

251 ms

mac.png

mac.png

478 ms

Windows.png

Windows.png

295 ms

Home-Mac%20Screen%20Edit%20with%20Word.jpg

Home-Mac%20Screen%20Edit%20with%20Word.jpg

68 ms

icon-1.png

icon-1.png

68 ms

icon-2.png

icon-2.png

105 ms

icon-3.png

icon-3.png

102 ms

WR_Philip_Newton.png

WR_Philip_Newton.png

102 ms

WR_Jack_Newton.png

WR_Jack_Newton.png

140 ms

WR_Erin_Stallings.png

WR_Erin_Stallings.png

134 ms

get-it-now-bg.jpg

get-it-now-bg.jpg

140 ms

icon-fb.png

icon-fb.png

153 ms

icon-twitter.png

icon-twitter.png

165 ms

icon-linkedin.png

icon-linkedin.png

164 ms

banner.js

banner.js

77 ms

3365575.js

3365575.js

104 ms

fb.js

fb.js

51 ms

web-interactives-embed.js

web-interactives-embed.js

69 ms

leadflows.js

leadflows.js

49 ms

Accessibility Review

wordrake.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes are not valid or misspelled

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

wordrake.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wordrake.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wordrake.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wordrake.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wordrake.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Word Rake. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: