Tools & Wizards About Us
workcomposer.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

workcomposer.com

Best Time Tracking & Productivity Monitoring Software - WorkComposer

Page Load Speed

233 ms in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

220 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

workcomposer.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to workcomposer.com homepage info - get ready to check Work Composer best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about workcomposer.com

Time tracking with WorkComposer boosts team efficiency and performance. Discover the ultimate productivity monitoring software designed for your success. Start free trial

Visit workcomposer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Workcomposer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 220 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

workcomposer.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.2 s

25/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

workcomposer.com

13 ms

workcomposer.com

19 ms

www.workcomposer.com

67 ms

app.7.js

4 ms

app.7.css

10 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Workcomposer.com, 59% (19 requests) were made to Files.workcomposer.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (95 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 85.3 kB (29%)

Content Size

290.3 kB

After Optimization

205.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Workcomposer.com main page is 290.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 234.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 47.2 kB

  • Original 56.1 kB
  • After minification 38.4 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.8 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 38.1 kB

  • Original 234.1 kB
  • After minification 196.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Work Composer needs image optimization as it can save up to 38.1 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Work Composer. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

workcomposer.com

workcomposer.com

13 ms

workcomposer.com

workcomposer.com

19 ms

www.workcomposer.com

www.workcomposer.com

67 ms

app.7.js

app.7.js

4 ms

app.7.css

app.7.css

10 ms

js

js

95 ms

1663925621961.jpg

1663925621961.jpg

43 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

37 ms

img15.webp

img15.webp

36 ms

img16.webp

img16.webp

40 ms

img17.webp

img17.webp

42 ms

img18.webp

img18.webp

46 ms

img19.webp

img19.webp

45 ms

img20.webp

img20.webp

43 ms

1663876270219.png

1663876270219.png

44 ms

1666901091778.png

1666901091778.png

43 ms

1670885349449.png

1670885349449.png

45 ms

1657971822173.png

1657971822173.png

48 ms

1657971935153.png

1657971935153.png

50 ms

1670963193023.png

1670963193023.png

46 ms

1670963104315.png

1670963104315.png

47 ms

1670962912914.png

1670962912914.png

48 ms

1670963156270.png

1670963156270.png

50 ms

1663864752603.png

1663864752603.png

47 ms

1663935246779.jpg

1663935246779.jpg

51 ms

1662879133037.png

1662879133037.png

51 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

15 ms

logo2sq.png

logo2sq.png

8 ms

app.webp

app.webp

24 ms

hp1.webp

hp1.webp

24 ms

hp2.webp

hp2.webp

15 ms

hp3.webp

hp3.webp

25 ms

Accessibility Review

workcomposer.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

workcomposer.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

workcomposer.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Workcomposer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Workcomposer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

workcomposer.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Work Composer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: