2.7 sec in total
453 ms
1.3 sec
948 ms
Click here to check amazing Working Draft content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about workingdraft.de
Wöchentlicher Podcast für Webdesigner:innen und -entwickler:innen
Visit workingdraft.deWe analyzed Workingdraft.de page load time and found that the first response time was 453 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
workingdraft.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value2.8 s
84/100
25%
Value4.2 s
77/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.7 s
46/100
10%
453 ms
225 ms
223 ms
238 ms
240 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Workingdraft.de, 9% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Paypal.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (453 ms) belongs to the original domain Workingdraft.de.
Page size can be reduced by 279.2 kB (70%)
400.1 kB
120.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Workingdraft.de main page is 400.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 280.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Working Draft needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 187.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 187.2 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Workingdraft.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (40%)
20
12
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Working Draft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
workingdraft.de
453 ms
style.css
225 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
223 ms
podpress.css
238 ms
1pixelout_audio-player.js
240 ms
jquery.js
370 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
241 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
449 ms
podpress.js
345 ms
wp-embed.min.js
252 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
157 ms
ga.js
4 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
btn_donate_SM.gif
49 ms
pixel.gif
55 ms
logo-working-draft.png
436 ms
icon.png
437 ms
audio_mp3_button.png
436 ms
hosted-by-host-europe.gif
435 ms
load.js
328 ms
__utm.gif
326 ms
loader.js
9 ms
workingdraft.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
workingdraft.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
workingdraft.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Workingdraft.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Workingdraft.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
workingdraft.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Working Draft. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: