Tools & Wizards About Us
workingincontent.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

workingincontent.com

WorkingInContent.com - Grow your career in content design

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

85 ms

Resources Loaded

662 ms

Page Rendered

906 ms

workingincontent.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Working In Content content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about workingincontent.com

Jobs, events, resources, community, and even an annual festival — whether you are breaking in, stepping up, or leading the leaders: there's something to help every career flourish.

Visit workingincontent.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Workingincontent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

workingincontent.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value300 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.5 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

workingincontent.com

85 ms

workingincontent.com

206 ms

_style.css

40 ms

56a01.png

169 ms

wic-logo.png

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Workingincontent.com, 47% (17 requests) were made to Wic-pro-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Cdn.usefathom.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (373 ms) relates to the external source Wic-pro-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 69.5 kB (2%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

4.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Workingincontent.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 68.4 kB

  • Original 86.8 kB
  • After minification 86.7 kB
  • After compression 18.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 584 B

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 4.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Working In Content images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 486 B

  • Original 85.7 kB
  • After minification 85.7 kB
  • After compression 85.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 13.0 kB
  • After minification 13.0 kB
  • After compression 13.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Workingincontent.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (38%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Working In Content. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

workingincontent.com

workingincontent.com

85 ms

workingincontent.com

workingincontent.com

206 ms

_style.css

_style.css

40 ms

56a01.png

56a01.png

169 ms

wic-logo.png

wic-logo.png

63 ms

speakers-2022.png

speakers-2022.png

68 ms

cc0e8.png

cc0e8.png

176 ms

f5a97.png

f5a97.png

141 ms

df44c.png

df44c.png

136 ms

34639.png

34639.png

140 ms

9f289.png

9f289.png

139 ms

58dd7.png

58dd7.png

153 ms

59dc3.png

59dc3.png

164 ms

696f0.png

696f0.png

225 ms

e2811.png

e2811.png

213 ms

0c2e1.png

0c2e1.png

212 ms

ea94c.png

ea94c.png

223 ms

073aa.png

073aa.png

266 ms

c692a.png

c692a.png

231 ms

ecffd.png

ecffd.png

312 ms

6489d.png

6489d.png

344 ms

c6fe2.png

c6fe2.png

373 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

105 ms

top-menu.js

top-menu.js

70 ms

floating-newsletter.js

floating-newsletter.js

69 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

74 ms

transcript.js

transcript.js

104 ms

apply-expired.js

apply-expired.js

104 ms

script.js

script.js

62 ms

cookie-consent-4.0.0.js

cookie-consent-4.0.0.js

105 ms

utm.js

utm.js

104 ms

index.js

index.js

163 ms

js

js

133 ms

beacon.min.js

beacon.min.js

132 ms

main.js

main.js

6 ms

ck.5.js

ck.5.js

59 ms

Accessibility Review

workingincontent.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

workingincontent.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

workingincontent.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Workingincontent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Workingincontent.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

workingincontent.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Working In Content. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: