Tools & Wizards About Us
worktile.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

worktile.com

Worktile - 70万+团队都在用的项目协作工具

Page Load Speed

35.6 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

34.3 sec

Page Rendered

205 ms

worktile.com screenshot

About Website

Visit worktile.com now to see the best up-to-date Worktile content for China and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about worktile.com

Worktile 深度整合项目与任务管理、OKR、网盘、在线沟通等应用，支持丰富的自定义功能，满足各行业各场景的个性化工作需求，助力企业提高管理效能。

Visit worktile.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Worktile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 34.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

worktile.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value16.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value30.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value820 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.122

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

worktile.com

1151 ms

worktile.com

7350 ms

base_common.css

1919 ms

base_outer.css

1480 ms

worktile.outer.min.js

19833 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Worktile.com, 9% (1 request) were made to Hm.baidu.com and 9% (1 request) were made to Cdn.mxpnl.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.9 sec) relates to the external source Hm.baidu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 205.4 kB (48%)

Content Size

430.7 kB

After Optimization

225.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Worktile.com main page is 430.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 248.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 205.0 kB

  • Original 248.2 kB
  • After minification 245.3 kB
  • After compression 43.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 205.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 366 B

  • Original 161.8 kB
  • After minification 161.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Worktile images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 65 B

  • Original 20.8 kB
  • After minification 20.8 kB
  • After compression 20.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Worktile. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

worktile.com

worktile.com

1151 ms

worktile.com

worktile.com

7350 ms

base_common.css

base_common.css

1919 ms

base_outer.css

base_outer.css

1480 ms

worktile.outer.min.js

worktile.outer.min.js

19833 ms

h.js

h.js

19879 ms

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

mixpanel-2-latest.min.js

122 ms

index_all_bg_1.jpg

index_all_bg_1.jpg

3944 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

106 ms

atrk.gif

atrk.gif

68 ms

93 ms

Accessibility Review

worktile.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

worktile.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

worktile.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Worktile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Worktile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

worktile.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Worktile. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: