Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

worldreviews.com

WORLDREVIEWS.COM Reviews of everything from art to football to wine. Read reviews. Write reviews.

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

236 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

418 ms

worldreviews.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to worldreviews.com homepage info - get ready to check WORLDREVIEWS best content right away, or after learning these important things about worldreviews.com

World Reviews is the site for worldwide reviews of everything from art to football to wine. Read them or write them.

Visit worldreviews.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Worldreviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 236 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

worldreviews.com performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

worldreviews.com

236 ms

worldreviews.com

368 ms

Arch200b.gif

170 ms

bannerno5.gif

329 ms

1HOME.gif

256 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Worldreviews.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (929 ms) belongs to the original domain Worldreviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 21.5 kB (2%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Worldreviews.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 16.7 kB
  • After minification 16.2 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WORLDREVIEWS images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WORLDREVIEWS. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

worldreviews.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

worldreviews.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

worldreviews.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Worldreviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Worldreviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WORLDREVIEWS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: