16.8 sec in total
2.7 sec
13.9 sec
200 ms
Click here to check amazing Worlds View content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about worldsview.com
WorldsView offers hardware and software solutions in South Africa, to facilitate your organisation's successful project development and execution.
Visit worldsview.comWe analyzed Worldsview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 14.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
worldsview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.1 s
0/100
10%
Value21.8 s
0/100
25%
Value27.0 s
0/100
10%
Value4,420 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.053
98/100
15%
Value24.9 s
0/100
10%
2699 ms
758 ms
776 ms
776 ms
775 ms
Our browser made a total of 147 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (116 requests) were addressed to the original Worldsview.com, 9% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) belongs to the original domain Worldsview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 110.3 kB (5%)
2.0 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Worldsview.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Worlds View images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Worldsview.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 112 (85%)
132
20
The browser has sent 132 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Worlds View. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 84 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.worldsview.com
2699 ms
style.min.css
758 ms
styles.css
776 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
776 ms
init.css
775 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
772 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
768 ms
simple-banner.css
1139 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
1164 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
1153 ms
style.css
1160 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1160 ms
style.min.css
1167 ms
style.css
1523 ms
dripicons.css
1560 ms
kiko-all.css
1549 ms
font-awesome-5.min.css
1924 ms
stylesheet.min.css
2686 ms
print.css
1546 ms
style_dynamic.css
1905 ms
responsive.min.css
2302 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
1929 ms
js_composer.min.css
2717 ms
css
24 ms
core-dashboard.min.css
2287 ms
style.css
2307 ms
smartslider.min.css
2309 ms
css
31 ms
jquery.min.js
2714 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
2680 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
2680 ms
simple-banner.js
2714 ms
n2.min.js
3436 ms
smartslider-frontend.min.js
3446 ms
ss-simple.min.js
3063 ms
particle.min.js
3077 ms
cookie-law-info-table.css
2710 ms
index.js
2721 ms
api.js
32 ms
index.js
3079 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
2712 ms
core.min.js
2705 ms
accordion.min.js
2702 ms
menu.min.js
3048 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
3058 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
3056 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2715 ms
dom-ready.min.js
2701 ms
hooks.min.js
2692 ms
i18n.min.js
3037 ms
a11y.min.js
3043 ms
autocomplete.min.js
3043 ms
controlgroup.min.js
2706 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
2684 ms
button.min.js
2683 ms
datepicker.min.js
3018 ms
mouse.min.js
2675 ms
resizable.min.js
2662 ms
draggable.min.js
2680 ms
dialog.min.js
2321 ms
droppable.min.js
2308 ms
style.css
2647 ms
progressbar.min.js
2752 ms
selectable.min.js
2386 ms
sortable.min.js
2387 ms
slider.min.js
2354 ms
spinner.min.js
2381 ms
tooltip.min.js
2628 ms
tabs.min.js
2629 ms
effect.min.js
2294 ms
effect-blind.min.js
2338 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
2334 ms
effect-clip.min.js
2370 ms
effect-drop.min.js
2273 ms
effect-explode.min.js
2265 ms
effect-fade.min.js
2279 ms
effect-fold.min.js
2310 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
2310 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
2368 ms
effect-size.min.js
2274 ms
effect-scale.min.js
2273 ms
effect-shake.min.js
2278 ms
effect-slide.min.js
2310 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
2310 ms
doubletaptogo.js
2368 ms
modernizr.min.js
2275 ms
jquery.appear.js
2267 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
2277 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
2312 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
2317 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
2368 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
2274 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
2272 ms
jquery.form.min.js
2280 ms
waypoints.min.js
2315 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
2318 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
2368 ms
gtm.js
153 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
2165 ms
skrollr.js
2167 ms
default_dynamic.js
2179 ms
default.min.js
2609 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G1ilXvVUg.ttf
23 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G5ClXvVUg.ttf
98 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GiClXvVUg.ttf
54 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVilXvVUg.ttf
53 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GCC5XvVUg.ttf
31 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GMS5XvVUg.ttf
31 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVi5XvVUg.ttf
31 ms
pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4Gfy5XvVUg.ttf
32 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
32 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
51 ms
ajax.min.js
2232 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
2265 ms
js
60 ms
analytics.js
30 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
169 ms
js
92 ms
qode-like.min.js
2247 ms
index.js
2256 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2609 ms
cropped-WT-Web-Icon-2.png
2322 ms
WV-Logo.png
2330 ms
ga-audiences
66 ms
Solutions-AEC-1.png
4012 ms
Solutions-PDM.png
3775 ms
Solutions-ME.png
3842 ms
cropped-WT-Web-Icon-2-50x20.png
2341 ms
WV-Home-Metrics-1-300x300.jpg
2353 ms
WV-Home-Metrics-2.1-300x300.png
2610 ms
WV-Home-Metrics-4-300x300.jpg
2611 ms
WV-Home-Metrics-3-300x300.jpg
2416 ms
WV-Home-Metrics-5-300x300.jpg
2669 ms
Untitled-design-13-300x134.png
2726 ms
WV-Logo-White.png
2736 ms
recaptcha__en.js
56 ms
anchor
43 ms
styles__ltr.css
4 ms
recaptcha__en.js
11 ms
qnm01WqSoqK7Jyx1yaELvF3K6C5BI8IwwjZQJfkFqNo.js
34 ms
webworker.js
35 ms
logo_48.png
20 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
5 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
21 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
36 ms
recaptcha__en.js
17 ms
worldsview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
worldsview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
worldsview.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Worldsview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Worldsview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
worldsview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Worlds View. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: