Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

woundwraps.com

久久热,久久精品视频在线看99,久热在线这里只有精品,思思99热久久精品在线6,伊人影院蕉久影院在线

Page Load Speed

24 sec in total

First Response

965 ms

Resources Loaded

22.7 sec

Page Rendered

333 ms

woundwraps.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to woundwraps.com homepage info - get ready to check Woundwraps best content right away, or after learning these important things about woundwraps.com

久久热,久久精品视频在线看99,久热在线这里只有精品,思思99热久久精品在线6,伊人影院蕉久影院在线,少妇人妻综合久久中文字幕,52视频,色婷婷五月亚洲一区二区91,英国同性恋合法,成年人吸奶

Visit woundwraps.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Woundwraps.com page load time and found that the first response time was 965 ms and then it took 23.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

woundwraps.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

woundwraps.com

965 ms

style.css

80 ms

devoling.png

234 ms

Medical-Supplies.jpg

208 ms

z_stat.php

1149 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Woundwraps.com, 8% (1 request) were made to S13.cnzz.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Z7.cnzz.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source C.cnzz.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 43.3 kB (55%)

Content Size

79.4 kB

After Optimization

36.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Woundwraps.com main page is 79.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 29.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 29.6 kB
  • After minification 28.8 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 638 B

  • Original 23.8 kB
  • After minification 23.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Woundwraps images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 11.8 kB
  • After minification 11.8 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 14.2 kB
  • After minification 11.2 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Woundwraps.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Woundwraps. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

woundwraps.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

woundwraps.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

woundwraps.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Woundwraps.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Woundwraps.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Woundwraps. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: