3.1 sec in total
226 ms
2.5 sec
379 ms
Welcome to wp-reviews.com homepage info - get ready to check WP Reviews best content right away, or after learning these important things about wp-reviews.com
Expert Reviews of WordPress Plugins & Themes. Your Best Source of Information for WordPress. Find the most detailed Analyses to help you decide!
Visit wp-reviews.comWe analyzed Wp-reviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 226 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
wp-reviews.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value3.8 s
56/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.6 s
91/100
10%
226 ms
511 ms
248 ms
298 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Wp-reviews.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.bibblio.org and 3% (1 request) were made to App.truconversion.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Wp-reviews.com.
Page size can be reduced by 157.9 kB (19%)
812.1 kB
654.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Wp-reviews.com main page is 812.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 511.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 153.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 153.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WP Reviews images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 776 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wp-reviews.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (56%)
32
14
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WP Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wp-reviews.com
226 ms
wp-reviews.com
511 ms
a961e.js
248 ms
style.min.css
298 ms
css
35 ms
style.min.css
372 ms
bibblio_related_posts-public.css
317 ms
bib-related-content.css
43 ms
astra-addon-65896190c35304-25374119.css
343 ms
addthis_wordpress_public.min.css
358 ms
jquery.min.js
460 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
588 ms
bibblio_related_posts-public.js
627 ms
continually-embed.latest.min.js
364 ms
addthis_widget.js
276 ms
style.min.js
675 ms
bib-related-content.js
37 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
676 ms
masonry.min.js
742 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
878 ms
astra-addon-65896190c39915-39240493.js
927 ms
pagination-infinite.min.js
916 ms
cropped-WPReviewsLogo-2-180x50.png
306 ms
Wordfence-Review-1200x1200-layout548-1fg3fkt-1024x1024.png
401 ms
Page-Builders-Review-1200x1200-layout548-1fg3c3a-1024x1024.png
649 ms
1_c9c9z2lHfz9wwAEB285k1g-1024x614.jpeg
725 ms
OptinMonster-Review-1200x1200-layout548-1fg3fej-1024x1024.png
463 ms
Lead-Generation-Review-1200x1200-layout548-1fg3cn1-1024x1024.png
761 ms
WooCommerce-Review-1200x1200-layout548-1fg3evc-1024x1024.png
854 ms
Yoast-Review-1200x1200-layout548-1fg3f89-1024x1024.png
824 ms
Form-Plugins-Review-1200x1200-layout548-1fg3cf1-1024x1024.png
847 ms
clement-h-544786-unsplash-1024x683.jpg
1046 ms
emile-perron-190221-unsplash-1024x576.jpg
1114 ms
WPReviewsLogoWhite-300x97.png
1055 ms
astra.woff
1066 ms
wp-reviews.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
wp-reviews.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wp-reviews.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wp-reviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wp-reviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wp-reviews.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of WP Reviews. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: