Tools & Wizards About Us
wpcamp.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

wpcamp.de

WP CAMP – Ein WordPress-Blog

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

378 ms

Resources Loaded

981 ms

Page Rendered

86 ms

wpcamp.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wpcamp.de homepage info - get ready to check WP CAMP best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about wpcamp.de

Visit wpcamp.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Wpcamp.de page load time and found that the first response time was 378 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wpcamp.de performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

91/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wpcamp.de

378 ms

matomo.js

591 ms

adsbygoogle.js

118 ms

171 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wpcamp.de, 25% (1 request) were made to Stats.myserverhome.de and 25% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (591 ms) relates to the external source Stats.myserverhome.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 823 B (1%)

Content Size

87.2 kB

After Optimization

86.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Wpcamp.de main page is 87.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 85.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 778 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 893 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 778 B or 47% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 45 B

  • Original 85.5 kB
  • After minification 85.5 kB
  • After compression 85.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WP CAMP. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

wpcamp.de

wpcamp.de

378 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

591 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

118 ms

171 ms

Accessibility Review

wpcamp.de accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

wpcamp.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

wpcamp.de SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wpcamp.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wpcamp.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wpcamp.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WP CAMP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: