20.6 sec in total
10 sec
10.4 sec
189 ms
Visit wphow.org now to see the best up-to-date Wphow content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wphow.org
I’m an experienced WordPress specialist who creates smart, efficient, reliable business websites that integrate seamlessly with your existing processes and platforms.
Visit wphow.orgWe analyzed Wphow.org page load time and found that the first response time was 10 sec and then it took 10.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
wphow.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value9.5 s
11/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.08
94/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
9965 ms
142 ms
159 ms
167 ms
142 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Wphow.org, 5% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Assets.pinterest.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10 sec) belongs to the original domain Wphow.org.
Page size can be reduced by 743.4 kB (53%)
1.4 MB
658.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Wphow.org main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 488.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wphow images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 341.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 341.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 265.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wphow.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 265.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (69%)
55
17
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wphow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wphow.org
9965 ms
reset.css
142 ms
style.css
159 ms
4f0501df24fea.css
167 ms
structure.css
142 ms
font-awesome.min.css
147 ms
style.css
217 ms
juiz_last_tweet.css
223 ms
orgSeries.css
220 ms
style.css
234 ms
jetpack.css
244 ms
mwm-aal.css
293 ms
slidedeck.css
364 ms
lens.css
337 ms
default.css
334 ms
jquery.js
389 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
368 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
411 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
418 ms
slidedeck.jquery.js
437 ms
slidedeck-public.js
566 ms
widgets.js
5 ms
lens.js
454 ms
pinit.js
8 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
313 ms
mlt.js
14 ms
header04.png
139 ms
pinit_main.js
32 ms
mlt.js
42 ms
6e8244a044cacc30b01d1608763cf5d3
54 ms
pf-button-both.gif
54 ms
hash-white.png
84 ms
overlays-sprite.png
126 ms
prev-next-deck-nav.png
99 ms
23317C_0_0.woff
298 ms
badge1.png
12 ms
videousermanuals.png
213 ms
slidedeck2.png
301 ms
need-a-website.png
245 ms
badge1.png
21 ms
badge1.png
8 ms
core.min.js
120 ms
widget.min.js
112 ms
mouse.min.js
135 ms
sortable.min.js
125 ms
comment-reply.min.js
148 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
8 ms
gprofiles.js
57 ms
wpgroho.js
190 ms
wp-embed.min.js
195 ms
css
23 ms
e-201611.js
7 ms
recorder
188 ms
business.screenr.com
127 ms
printfriendly.js
46 ms
hovercard.css
69 ms
services.css
70 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
6 ms
g.gif
4 ms
Screen-Shot-2014-09-05-at-12.19.09-am.jpg
314 ms
lazy-load-large.gif
79 ms
prev-next-default.png
86 ms
wphow.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wphow.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
wphow.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wphow.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wphow.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wphow.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wphow. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: