2.9 sec in total
443 ms
1.9 sec
502 ms
Click here to check amazing Wp Reviews Tudio content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wpreviewstudio.com
Looking for WordPress theme reviews? At WPReviewStudio, we will show you the complete WordPress theme reviews, plugin reviews, web hosting reviews and email marketing services reviews!
Visit wpreviewstudio.comWe analyzed Wpreviewstudio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 443 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
wpreviewstudio.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
48/100
10%
Value3.6 s
59/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.402
25/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
443 ms
73 ms
129 ms
182 ms
159 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Wpreviewstudio.com, 38% (31 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (952 ms) belongs to the original domain Wpreviewstudio.com.
Page size can be reduced by 142.1 kB (26%)
544.9 kB
402.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Wpreviewstudio.com main page is 544.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 200.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 112.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.3 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wp Reviews Tudio images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 20.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wpreviewstudio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (77%)
48
11
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wp Reviews Tudio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wpreviewstudio.com
443 ms
js
73 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
129 ms
style.css
182 ms
style.min.css
159 ms
classic-themes.min.css
425 ms
screen.min.css
136 ms
style.css
412 ms
frontend.min.css
257 ms
flatpickr.min.css
252 ms
select2.min.css
272 ms
dashicons.min.css
305 ms
css
40 ms
default.css
369 ms
font-awesome.min.css
373 ms
wp-review.css
409 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
428 ms
jquery.min.js
493 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
502 ms
flatpickr.min.js
539 ms
select2.min.js
524 ms
responsive-menu.js
534 ms
adsbygoogle.js
65 ms
socialsnap.css
615 ms
flying-pages.min.js
637 ms
front.min.js
637 ms
ta.js
641 ms
frontend.min.js
952 ms
bj-lazy-load.min.js
675 ms
js.cookie.min.js
663 ms
jquery.appear.js
736 ms
underscore.min.js
735 ms
wp-util.min.js
748 ms
main.js
787 ms
jquery.knob.min.js
804 ms
OneSignalSDK.js
38 ms
socialsnap.js
853 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
linkid.js
5 ms
collect
13 ms
ury8lmq.js
323 ms
online-store-800x329.jpg
308 ms
Create-a-Multi-Page-Form-800x329.png
297 ms
enable-Mobile-Exit-Intent-using-optinmonster-800x329.png
240 ms
Move-From-Contact-Form-7-To-WPForms-800x329.png
250 ms
top-affiliate-links-800x329.png
258 ms
track-fb-instant-articles-800x329.png
261 ms
creating-quiz-form-using-formidable-forms-800x329.png
267 ms
How-To-Integrate-PayPal-With-WPForms-Step-By-Step-Guide-800x329.png
270 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
344 ms
wARDj0u
15 ms
i
40 ms
i
103 ms
i
124 ms
i
187 ms
i
77 ms
i
142 ms
i
167 ms
i
246 ms
i
228 ms
i
270 ms
i
205 ms
i
265 ms
i
223 ms
i
350 ms
i
245 ms
i
245 ms
i
288 ms
i
264 ms
i
313 ms
i
264 ms
i
308 ms
i
331 ms
i
349 ms
i
330 ms
i
491 ms
i
392 ms
i
438 ms
i
367 ms
i
485 ms
i
462 ms
wpreviewstudio.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
wpreviewstudio.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
wpreviewstudio.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wpreviewstudio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wpreviewstudio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wpreviewstudio.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wp Reviews Tudio. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: