6.4 sec in total
348 ms
4.3 sec
1.7 sec
Welcome to wpsitesafe.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Wpsitesafe best content right away, or after learning these important things about wpsitesafe.co.uk
Let WP Site Safe take care of your WordPress Maintenance. Our WordPress support packages include full backups, performance scans, content updates, security, optimisation, backups all provided in a mon...
Visit wpsitesafe.co.ukWe analyzed Wpsitesafe.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 348 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
wpsitesafe.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value10.0 s
27/100
10%
348 ms
2300 ms
105 ms
201 ms
251 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Wpsitesafe.co.uk, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Wpsitesafe.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 243.0 kB (13%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Wpsitesafe.co.uk main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 125.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wpsitesafe images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 38.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.6 kB or 21% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wpsitesafe.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.8 kB or 36% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (91%)
54
5
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wpsitesafe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wpsitesafe.co.uk
348 ms
wpsitesafe.co.uk
2300 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
105 ms
style.min.css
201 ms
styles.css
251 ms
be-slider.css
274 ms
oshine-modules.css
369 ms
settings.css
244 ms
tatsu.min.css
280 ms
style.css
275 ms
bb-press.css
309 ms
main.css
402 ms
top-header.css
342 ms
responsive-header.css
365 ms
multilevel-menu.css
370 ms
layout.css
390 ms
magnific-popup.css
433 ms
scrollbar.css
439 ms
flickity.css
456 ms
fonts.css
463 ms
style.css
480 ms
masterslider.main.css
473 ms
custom.css
521 ms
css
70 ms
jquery.js
624 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
577 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
653 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
618 ms
modernizr.js
577 ms
sharethis.js
69 ms
comment-reply.min.js
601 ms
scripts.js
676 ms
asyncloader.js
674 ms
core.min.js
803 ms
widget.min.js
808 ms
accordion.min.js
809 ms
tabs.min.js
809 ms
oshine-modules.js
807 ms
es6-promise.auto.min.js
809 ms
tatsu.min.js
810 ms
perfect-scrollbar.jquery.js
764 ms
script.js
668 ms
wp-embed.min.js
869 ms
WP_Site_Safe.jpg
753 ms
Site_Safe_Icon.png
261 ms
loader.gif
600 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
272 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
272 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
276 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
272 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
275 ms
icomoon.woff
331 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
268 ms
analytics.js
270 ms
vivusSVGanimation.js
251 ms
fitvids.js
248 ms
resizetoparent.js
248 ms
transparentheader.js
241 ms
fullscreenheight.js
245 ms
superfish.js
241 ms
hoverintent.js
293 ms
magnificpopup.js
295 ms
easing.js
242 ms
collect
80 ms
wpsitesafe.co.uk accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wpsitesafe.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wpsitesafe.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wpsitesafe.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wpsitesafe.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wpsitesafe.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wpsitesafe. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: