2.6 sec in total
263 ms
2.1 sec
271 ms
Visit wpsupport.io now to see the best up-to-date Wp Support content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wpsupport.io
If you are in need for WordPress support from experts, you came to the right place. We are no ordinary IT team. We are WordPress Superheroes! It’s our mission to protect and serve your WordPress insta...
Visit wpsupport.ioWe analyzed Wpsupport.io page load time and found that the first response time was 263 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
wpsupport.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value7.6 s
3/100
25%
Value5.6 s
52/100
10%
Value280 ms
81/100
30%
Value0.25
50/100
15%
Value7.3 s
49/100
10%
263 ms
472 ms
90 ms
181 ms
266 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Wpsupport.io, 21% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (838 ms) belongs to the original domain Wpsupport.io.
Page size can be reduced by 125.1 kB (19%)
666.8 kB
541.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Wpsupport.io main page is 666.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 264.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wp Support images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wpsupport.io has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (79%)
47
10
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wp Support. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wpsupport.io
263 ms
wpsupport.io
472 ms
style.css
90 ms
owl.carousel.theme.style.css
181 ms
owl.transitions.css
266 ms
single-post.css
265 ms
style.min.css
268 ms
classic-themes.min.css
265 ms
styles.css
270 ms
full-styles.6.10.2.css
273 ms
mkhb-render.css
349 ms
mkhb-row.css
351 ms
mkhb-column.css
350 ms
joinchat-btn.min.css
352 ms
js_composer.min.css
538 ms
theme-options-production-1707231298.css
364 ms
shortcodes-styles.min.css
615 ms
Defaults.css
437 ms
style.min.css
447 ms
webfontloader.js
439 ms
jquery.min.js
456 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
524 ms
owl.carousel-min.js
527 ms
script-min.js
535 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
563 ms
custom.min.js
611 ms
js
56 ms
index.js
642 ms
index.js
642 ms
smoothscroll.js
642 ms
core-scripts.6.10.2.js
838 ms
components-full.6.10.2.js
701 ms
mkhb-render.js
702 ms
mkhb-column.js
702 ms
joinchat.min.js
710 ms
shortcodes-scripts.min.js
835 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
836 ms
lazyload.min.js
836 ms
css
74 ms
wp-support-logo.png
355 ms
wp-support-logo-white-1.png
354 ms
map-wp-support.jpg
376 ms
bas-150x150-pwk2yoh97qvtnah7x34ht8ef0de9ecr93pv9jhovzc.jpg
355 ms
ward-150x150-pwk2y3st1e3ijvb99u6padm9xw86p0h5ovikzejjs8.jpg
355 ms
grace-150x150-pwk2xpp86vk7ppvqk63aqz6d145ohjx6mxqas94gdk.jpg
376 ms
wp-support-logo-white.png
375 ms
js
298 ms
analytics.js
315 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
315 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
388 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
403 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVQ.woff
406 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
406 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
405 ms
w8gdH283Tvk__Lua32TysjIfp8uJ.woff
404 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexg.woff
404 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk_RkWVAexg.woff
403 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexg.woff
408 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexg.woff
407 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexg.woff
406 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexg.woff
406 ms
collect
120 ms
wpsupport.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wpsupport.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
wpsupport.io SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wpsupport.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wpsupport.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wpsupport.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wp Support. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: