Tools & Wizards About Us
wpthinktank.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 92

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

wpthinktank.com

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

287 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.9 sec

wpthinktank.com screenshot

About Website

Visit wpthinktank.com now to see the best up-to-date Wpthinktank content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wpthinktank.com

Visit wpthinktank.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wpthinktank.com page load time and found that the first response time was 287 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wpthinktank.com performance score

92

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.6 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.wpthinktank.com

287 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

34 ms

styles.css

44 ms

settings.css

40 ms

css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Wpthinktank.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (338 ms) belongs to the original domain Wpthinktank.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (37%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wpthinktank.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 35.5 kB

  • Original 45.5 kB
  • After minification 39.3 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 166.4 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wpthinktank images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 626.8 kB

  • Original 836.1 kB
  • After minification 704.3 kB
  • After compression 209.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 626.8 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 363.0 kB

  • Original 416.8 kB
  • After minification 342.8 kB
  • After compression 53.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wpthinktank.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 363.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (63%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wpthinktank. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.wpthinktank.com

www.wpthinktank.com

287 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

34 ms

styles.css

styles.css

44 ms

settings.css

settings.css

40 ms

css

css

23 ms

base.css

base.css

67 ms

layout.css

layout.css

48 ms

widgets.css

widgets.css

48 ms

style.css

style.css

76 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

62 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

102 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

69 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

122 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

90 ms

ext.js

ext.js

96 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

90 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

110 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

109 ms

jquery.transit.min.js

jquery.transit.min.js

112 ms

jquery.selene.js

jquery.selene.js

121 ms

jquery.quartz.js

jquery.quartz.js

126 ms

custom.js

custom.js

147 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

110 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

125 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

125 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

129 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

126 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

153 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

153 ms

jquery.color.min.js

jquery.color.min.js

150 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

173 ms

wp-mediaelement.js

wp-mediaelement.js

158 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

213 ms

_ioa_front.css

_ioa_front.css

165 ms

clogo.png

clogo.png

338 ms

Untitled-1.png

Untitled-1.png

331 ms

sh_type2.png

sh_type2.png

327 ms

mouse-click.jpg

mouse-click.jpg

332 ms

site51.png

site51.png

327 ms

logo_500x500.png

logo_500x500.png

328 ms

woocommerce-logo.png

woocommerce-logo.png

327 ms

logo_500x500-300x300.png

logo_500x500-300x300.png

329 ms

sh_type1.png

sh_type1.png

329 ms

d1-1069x360.jpg

d1-1069x360.jpg

331 ms

screenshot1.png

screenshot1.png

331 ms

himalayas-mac-1024x682.png

himalayas-mac-1024x682.png

335 ms

responsive.jpg

responsive.jpg

333 ms

promax800x800.png

promax800x800.png

331 ms

screenshot.png

screenshot.png

331 ms

screenshot-e1401653934541.png

screenshot-e1401653934541.png

333 ms

_ioa_front.woff

_ioa_front.woff

59 ms

Accessibility Review

wpthinktank.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

wpthinktank.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

wpthinktank.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wpthinktank.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Wpthinktank.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wpthinktank.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wpthinktank. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: