2.2 sec in total
51 ms
1.4 sec
732 ms
Click here to check amazing Wpworkflow content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wpworkflow.org
Launch your website in minutes with managed WordPress by EasyWP. Our optimized hosting plans include easy backups, a 99.9% uptime guarantee, and free CDN
Visit wpworkflow.orgWe analyzed Wpworkflow.org page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
wpworkflow.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
75/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value1,650 ms
11/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.9 s
27/100
10%
51 ms
120 ms
107 ms
27 ms
21 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wpworkflow.org, 92% (33 requests) were made to Easywp.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (519 ms) relates to the external source Easywp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 487.4 kB (57%)
860.6 kB
373.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Wpworkflow.org main page is 860.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 731.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 433.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wpworkflow needs image optimization as it can save up to 433.4 kB or 59% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 104 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 92 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wpworkflow.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (20%)
30
24
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wpworkflow. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wpworkflow.org
51 ms
120 ms
gtm.js
107 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
27 ms
style.min.css
21 ms
classic-themes.min.css
29 ms
style.css
29 ms
jquery.min.js
24 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
27 ms
comment_count.js
60 ms
index.js
61 ms
logo-easywp-tm.svg
43 ms
search.svg
39 ms
hamburger.svg
43 ms
EasyWP-5-best-SEO-plugins-1-cover.png
41 ms
richardk.png
41 ms
EasyWP-AZ-guide-single-page-1-cover.png
42 ms
sbalkhi.png
44 ms
EasyWP-top-9-ai-plugins-1-cover.png
49 ms
rodney.png
47 ms
EasyWP-complete-guide-API-plugins-1-cover.png
49 ms
EasyWP-15-landing-page-examples-1-cover.png
48 ms
default.png
47 ms
EasyWP-WordPress-staging-plugins-1-cover.png
48 ms
EasyWP-essential-WordPress-plugins-1-cover.png
60 ms
EasyWP-Google-Authenticator-1-cover.png
60 ms
EasyWP-blank-page-issue-1-cover.png
56 ms
EasyWP-craft-winning-policy-1-cover.png
56 ms
help-us.jpg
58 ms
Intelo-Regular.woff
444 ms
Intelo-Light.woff
519 ms
Intelo-Semibold.woff
67 ms
Intelo-Bold.woff
75 ms
count.js
46 ms
logo-easywp-octopus.svg
68 ms
logo-namecheap.svg
69 ms
wpworkflow.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
wpworkflow.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
wpworkflow.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wpworkflow.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wpworkflow.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wpworkflow.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wpworkflow. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: