Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

wrap.com

De-Escalation Solutions for Law Enforcement - WRAP

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

113 ms

Resources Loaded

814 ms

Page Rendered

3.4 sec

wrap.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wrap.com homepage info - get ready to check WRAP best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about wrap.com

Discover the Future of Non-Lethal Law Enforcement Solutions at Wrap Technologies. Explore our innovative solutions for safer policing.

Visit wrap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wrap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wrap.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.3 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,330 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wrap.com

113 ms

wrap.com

37 ms

api.js

51 ms

style.min.css

15 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Wrap.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (431 ms) belongs to the original domain Wrap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 291.5 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Wrap.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 174.3 kB

  • Original 202.4 kB
  • After minification 138.5 kB
  • After compression 28.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 63.9 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 174.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 75.8 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WRAP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 265.4 kB
  • After minification 265.4 kB
  • After compression 257.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 33.9 kB

  • Original 64.2 kB
  • After minification 54.0 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wrap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 53% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (34%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

57

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WRAP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wrap.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

wrap.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wrap.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wrap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wrap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of WRAP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: