Tools & Wizards About Us
wrap.me screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

wrap.me

Personalised Wrapping Paper & Personalised Greeting Cards | Wrap.me

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

150 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

90 ms

wrap.me screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wrap content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wrap.me

Create personalised photo wrapping paper using all your favourite photos. Choose from a sheet or a roll with prices starting from £9.99 including free UK delivery.

Visit wrap.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Wrap.me page load time and found that the first response time was 150 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wrap.me performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

wrap.me

150 ms

wrap.me

809 ms

gtm.js

37 ms

css

36 ms

css

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Wrap.me, 14% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (809 ms) belongs to the original domain Wrap.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 20.7 kB (8%)

Content Size

267.6 kB

After Optimization

246.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Wrap.me main page is 267.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 227.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 19.8 kB
  • After minification 17.5 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 20.8 kB
  • After minification 15.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wrap needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 864 B

  • Original 227.0 kB
  • After minification 227.0 kB
  • After compression 226.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wrap. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

wrap.me

wrap.me

150 ms

wrap.me

wrap.me

809 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

37 ms

css

css

36 ms

css

css

55 ms

application.css

application.css

505 ms

api.js

api.js

42 ms

vendor.js

vendor.js

718 ms

application.js

application.js

721 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

25 ms

122934.ct.js

122934.ct.js

92 ms

wrapme.png

wrapme.png

70 ms

close-btn.jpg

close-btn.jpg

139 ms

close-btn.png

close-btn.png

207 ms

SEO Factors

wrap.me SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wrap.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wrap.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wrap.me

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wrap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: