4.2 sec in total
199 ms
3.3 sec
688 ms
Visit wrightglazing.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Wright Glazing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wrightglazing.co.uk
We install Double Glazing in homes in Sutton, Ewell, Surbiton, Kensington, Fulham, Southfields, Putney, Wandsworth, and Wimbledon. Get a free quote!
Visit wrightglazing.co.ukWe analyzed Wrightglazing.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
wrightglazing.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value1,080 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.599
11/100
15%
Value8.9 s
35/100
10%
199 ms
343 ms
184 ms
619 ms
82 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Wrightglazing.co.uk, 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Sternfenster.com.
Page size can be reduced by 89.5 kB (2%)
4.2 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Wrightglazing.co.uk main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wright Glazing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wrightglazing.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (45%)
67
37
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wright Glazing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wrightglazing.co.uk
199 ms
wrightglazing.co.uk
343 ms
www.wrightglazing.co.uk
184 ms
www.wrightglazing.co.uk
619 ms
bootstrap.min.css
82 ms
bootstrap-responsive.min.css
162 ms
font-awesome.min.css
30 ms
widgetkit-d80650ee.css
328 ms
css.php
278 ms
css.php
287 ms
css.php
282 ms
css.php
299 ms
system.css
247 ms
general.css
335 ms
css.php
392 ms
css3effects.css
361 ms
wall.css
365 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
377 ms
jquery.min.js
489 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
412 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
440 ms
widgetkit-ee0b60c0.js
444 ms
mootools-core.js
458 ms
core.js
469 ms
mootools-more.js
666 ms
xtcMenu.js
519 ms
wallFX.js
522 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
537 ms
easing.js.min.js
548 ms
xtcScripts.js
567 ms
bootstrap.js
600 ms
vidresize.js
601 ms
js
56 ms
system.css
371 ms
lightbox.js
101 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
105 ms
spotlight.js
102 ms
callus.png
159 ms
aluminium-sliding-door-costs-Southfields.jpg
672 ms
Orangery%2002.jpg
413 ms
BI-FOLDINGDOOR.jpg
221 ms
glazed-extensions-sm.jpg
282 ms
glazed-extensions-sm.jpg
222 ms
doors-sm.jpg
223 ms
Bi-Folding%20Doors%2001.jpg
432 ms
adf42ed16df4b22a09c6bc62cb2e5e67_458x257.jpg
283 ms
171ec42504fad3915d3b44989e09bbed_458x257.jpg
409 ms
4e3d3c601d7bedd24f2a48dea26e5abe_458x257.jpg
411 ms
ggflogo.jpg
770 ms
fensa.png
412 ms
checkatrade.png
441 ms
trusted.png
448 ms
TGAS3.png
479 ms
insta.png
510 ms
pinterest.png
521 ms
tumb.png
530 ms
sdk.js
122 ms
WG_Logo.gif
512 ms
back.png
543 ms
455 ms
SourceSansPro-Regular-webfont.woff
456 ms
DSC0569-1.jpg
1040 ms
sdk.js
45 ms
DSC0061-1.jpg
754 ms
Patio%20Doors%2002.jpg
464 ms
Patio%20Doors%2006.jpg
491 ms
Conservatory%2003.jpg
659 ms
Conservatory%2001.jpg
676 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
544 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
41 ms
,
66 ms
slideshow.js
371 ms
2.jpg
81 ms
3.jpg
82 ms
4.jpg
82 ms
wrightglazing.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wrightglazing.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wrightglazing.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wrightglazing.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wrightglazing.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wrightglazing.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wright Glazing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: