Tools & Wizards About Us
wrightwayce.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

wrightwayce.com

Home - Wright Way Construction

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

886 ms

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

289 ms

wrightwayce.com screenshot

About Website

Visit wrightwayce.com now to see the best up-to-date Wright Way Ce content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wrightwayce.com

Visit wrightwayce.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wrightwayce.com page load time and found that the first response time was 886 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wrightwayce.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.545

13/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wrightwayce.com

886 ms

formidableforms.css

110 ms

light-box-styles.css

95 ms

swiper.min.css

93 ms

wp_head.css

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Wrightwayce.com, 19% (7 requests) were made to Wrightway.mbstoday.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Wrightwayce.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 244.8 kB (11%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Wrightwayce.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 189.7 kB

  • Original 225.7 kB
  • After minification 221.8 kB
  • After compression 36.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 189.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 53.6 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wright Way Ce images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 450 B

  • Original 156.1 kB
  • After minification 156.1 kB
  • After compression 155.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 41.1 kB
  • After minification 41.1 kB
  • After compression 40.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wrightwayce.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (62%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wright Way Ce. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

wrightwayce.com

wrightwayce.com

886 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

110 ms

light-box-styles.css

light-box-styles.css

95 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

93 ms

wp_head.css

wp_head.css

93 ms

public-main.css

public-main.css

104 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

94 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

98 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

103 ms

public-main.js

public-main.js

95 ms

js

js

80 ms

et-core-unified-11.min.css

et-core-unified-11.min.css

771 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1823 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

3574 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

3577 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

3575 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

3581 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

3685 ms

jquery.mobile.js

jquery.mobile.js

4743 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

4753 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

4752 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

4756 ms

common.js

common.js

4743 ms

Wright-Way-Construction-Logo-light.png

Wright-Way-Construction-Logo-light.png

1483 ms

AJQcZqK0rBHmsyk4anNZuRIa0JXgrueuVe-BrM7peuWhtYdVUrBfFd9vtTX6VP3TJzwZRAkOJVh67nQhw_xk5t3v5OYGr_gJ_DGcqQU=s1600-w300-h300

AJQcZqK0rBHmsyk4anNZuRIa0JXgrueuVe-BrM7peuWhtYdVUrBfFd9vtTX6VP3TJzwZRAkOJVh67nQhw_xk5t3v5OYGr_gJ_DGcqQU=s1600-w300-h300

174 ms

poweredby-white.png

poweredby-white.png

451 ms

dreamstimemedium_84664208.jpg

dreamstimemedium_84664208.jpg

1626 ms

Commercial-Renovation-scaled.jpg

Commercial-Renovation-scaled.jpg

1687 ms

dreamstimemedium_114088064.jpg

dreamstimemedium_114088064.jpg

1713 ms

dreamstimemedium_84664208.jpg

dreamstimemedium_84664208.jpg

1727 ms

dreamstimemedium_114088064.jpg

dreamstimemedium_114088064.jpg

1795 ms

Logo-3.png

Logo-3.png

1765 ms

powered_by_google_on_white.png

powered_by_google_on_white.png

4654 ms

guest.png

guest.png

4824 ms

BBB-Logo-300x153.png

BBB-Logo-300x153.png

4825 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-87-11-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-87-11-late.css

4027 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

4116 ms

Accessibility Review

wrightwayce.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

wrightwayce.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

wrightwayce.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wrightwayce.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wrightwayce.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

wrightwayce.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wright Way Ce. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: