Tools & Wizards About Us
writedom.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

writedom.com

Freelance writing company | Perfect job for academic writers

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

26 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

477 ms

writedom.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Writedom content for Kenya. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about writedom.com

Do you want to make money by writing academic papers? Then you should visit WriteDom! Become part of our team and get the most of your freelance life!

Visit writedom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Writedom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

writedom.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

33/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.613

10/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

writedom.com

26 ms

writedom.com

385 ms

css2

33 ms

front-view-bottom.css

24 ms

front-view-head.js

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Writedom.com, 63% (29 requests) were made to Static.express and 20% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (385 ms) belongs to the original domain Writedom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.8 kB (35%)

Content Size

152.9 kB

After Optimization

99.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Writedom.com main page is 152.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 70.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 53.6 kB

  • Original 70.6 kB
  • After minification 59.6 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.9 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 62.9 kB
  • After minification 62.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writedom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 43 B

  • Original 5.8 kB
  • After minification 5.8 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 110 B

  • Original 13.7 kB
  • After minification 13.7 kB
  • After compression 13.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writedom.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (29%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writedom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

writedom.com

writedom.com

26 ms

writedom.com

writedom.com

385 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

front-view-bottom.css

front-view-bottom.css

24 ms

front-view-head.js

front-view-head.js

45 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

50 ms

menu-open.svg

menu-open.svg

75 ms

logo_main.svg

logo_main.svg

95 ms

hero_img.svg

hero_img.svg

84 ms

reviews_io_logo.svg

reviews_io_logo.svg

90 ms

star.svg

star.svg

96 ms

star_half.svg

star_half.svg

83 ms

sitejabber_logo.svg

sitejabber_logo.svg

82 ms

expert1.svg

expert1.svg

97 ms

expert2.svg

expert2.svg

100 ms

benefits1.svg

benefits1.svg

37 ms

benefits2.svg

benefits2.svg

40 ms

benefits3.svg

benefits3.svg

50 ms

benefits4.svg

benefits4.svg

41 ms

benefits5.svg

benefits5.svg

42 ms

benefits6.svg

benefits6.svg

43 ms

process1.svg

process1.svg

45 ms

process2.svg

process2.svg

45 ms

process3.svg

process3.svg

48 ms

process4.svg

process4.svg

67 ms

earnings.svg

earnings.svg

52 ms

skillset_bg.svg

skillset_bg.svg

167 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

6 ms

front-view-bottom.js

front-view-bottom.js

12 ms

lazysizes.min.5.1.0.js

lazysizes.min.5.1.0.js

65 ms

review_avatar1.svg

review_avatar1.svg

67 ms

review_avatar4.svg

review_avatar4.svg

150 ms

review_avatar2.svg

review_avatar2.svg

64 ms

review_avatar5.svg

review_avatar5.svg

152 ms

review_avatar6.svg

review_avatar6.svg

155 ms

review_avatar3.svg

review_avatar3.svg

154 ms

wd-bottom-banner-bg-min.jpg

wd-bottom-banner-bg-min.jpg

157 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jvvKcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jvvKcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

57 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jjPKcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jjPKcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

94 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8j4PKcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8j4PKcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

119 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jPvKcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jPvKcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

106 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jvvOcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jvvOcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

108 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jYPWcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jYPWcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

128 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jWfWcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jWfWcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

108 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jPvWcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jPvWcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

131 ms

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jF_WcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jF_WcPtq-rprzpg.ttf

184 ms

Accessibility Review

writedom.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

writedom.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

writedom.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writedom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writedom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

writedom.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Writedom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: