7.9 sec in total
986 ms
6.5 sec
407 ms
Visit writeforresults.com now to see the best up-to-date Write For Results content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about writeforresults.com
Write for Results transform the business writing skills of top professionals and organisations across the world. Contact us to find out more.
Visit writeforresults.comWe analyzed Writeforresults.com page load time and found that the first response time was 986 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
writeforresults.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value1,280 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.181
67/100
15%
Value13.0 s
13/100
10%
986 ms
68 ms
320 ms
241 ms
248 ms
Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Writeforresults.com, 15% (16 requests) were made to Static.libsyn.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Writeforresults.com.
Page size can be reduced by 205.8 kB (2%)
13.2 MB
13.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Writeforresults.com main page is 13.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 12.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Write For Results images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writeforresults.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (66%)
94
32
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Write For Results. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
writeforresults.com
986 ms
js
68 ms
style.min.css
320 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
241 ms
grid-system.css
248 ms
style.css
332 ms
header-secondary-nav.css
264 ms
element-testimonial.css
322 ms
element-clients.css
326 ms
caroufredsel.css
352 ms
css
34 ms
responsive.css
399 ms
skin-original.css
401 ms
menu-dynamic.css
405 ms
widget-nectar-posts.css
410 ms
js_composer.min.css
440 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
460 ms
css
36 ms
jquery.min.js
463 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
382 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
388 ms
style-non-critical.css
129 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
167 ms
core.css
183 ms
core.min.js
233 ms
menu.min.js
233 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
234 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
365 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
364 ms
dom-ready.min.js
365 ms
hooks.min.js
364 ms
i18n.min.js
363 ms
a11y.min.js
363 ms
autocomplete.min.js
549 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
550 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
550 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
547 ms
priority.js
546 ms
transit.min.js
550 ms
waypoints.js
638 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
639 ms
hoverintent.min.js
639 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
638 ms
touchswipe.min.js
638 ms
caroufredsel.min.js
636 ms
nectar-testimonial-slider.js
741 ms
anime.min.js
735 ms
superfish.js
730 ms
init.js
795 ms
comment-reply.min.js
713 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
709 ms
forms.js
795 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
scott-logo-without-strapline-colour.jpg
715 ms
stamp-03.jpg
718 ms
Icon-stamp-02.jpg
710 ms
stamp-01.jpg
709 ms
MBP_0534.jpg
1330 ms
MBP_0537.jpg
3230 ms
Allen-Overy-Client.jpg
790 ms
196263562
334 ms
informa-client.jpg
769 ms
PWC-Client.jpg
776 ms
BAE-Systems-client.jpg
782 ms
The-Economist-client.jpg
848 ms
238 ms
collect
139 ms
DMW.jpg
718 ms
Sheffield-Health-Social-Care-Charity.jpg
731 ms
EY1.jpg
741 ms
linklaters.jpg
801 ms
slaughter-and-may.jpg
800 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
187 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
188 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
244 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
276 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
277 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
277 ms
icomoon.woff
815 ms
js
138 ms
libsyn-fonts.css
211 ms
bootstrap.min.css
198 ms
custom-player-bootstrap.min.css
212 ms
font-awesome.min.css
217 ms
css
103 ms
jcarousel.responsive.css
215 ms
jquery.min.js
208 ms
bootstrap.min.js
244 ms
moment.min.js
212 ms
player-0.0.12.min.js
250 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
240 ms
608689159-83c4530178669ea4f58e223272ddd8f3cb8a94278e910f9f3fbc07468d471e75-d
523 ms
website.png
236 ms
rss.png
236 ms
lock-black.svg
235 ms
rss-sm.png
233 ms
download.png
232 ms
embed.png
237 ms
share.png
238 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
850 ms
Gensler_logo-223x47-86bdd223.gif
697 ms
Jane_Podcast_Oct_2017.png
54 ms
libsyn-player-custom.png
56 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-regular.woff
70 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-300.woff
41 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-600.woff
30 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-700.woff
41 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-800.woff
40 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
170 ms
writeforresults.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
writeforresults.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
writeforresults.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writeforresults.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writeforresults.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
writeforresults.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Write For Results. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: