7.9 sec in total
17 ms
2.5 sec
5.4 sec
Visit writeincolour.com now to see the best up-to-date Write In Colour content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about writeincolour.com
I know what I am. I'm a writer.
Visit writeincolour.comWe analyzed Writeincolour.com page load time and found that the first response time was 17 ms and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
writeincolour.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value3.3 s
91/100
10%
Value1,310 ms
18/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.6 s
11/100
10%
17 ms
691 ms
119 ms
159 ms
127 ms
Our browser made a total of 249 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Writeincolour.com, 42% (105 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 20% (51 requests) were made to Api.pinterest.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Graph.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 717.1 kB (75%)
953.4 kB
236.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Writeincolour.com main page is 953.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 648.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 255.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 255.6 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Write In Colour needs image optimization as it can save up to 49 B or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 449.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 449.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writeincolour.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.8 kB or 62% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 179 (75%)
239
60
The browser has sent 239 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Write In Colour. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 67 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
writeincolour.com
17 ms
writeincolour.com
691 ms
119 ms
css
159 ms
127 ms
136 ms
142 ms
style.css
122 ms
gprofiles.js
471 ms
wpgroho.js
123 ms
131 ms
130 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
341 ms
w.js
147 ms
merriweather.css
49 ms
body-bg.png
157 ms
loading.gif
84 ms
global-print.css
5 ms
widgets.js
137 ms
Genericons.svg
37 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
6 ms
master.html
418 ms
Noticons.svg
355 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
279 ms
merriweather-bolditalic-webfont.ttf
434 ms
merriweather-italic-webfont.ttf
633 ms
merriweather-lightitalic-webfont.ttf
494 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
493 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
494 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
603 ms
760 ms
hovercard.css
446 ms
services.css
639 ms
count.json
721 ms
g.gif
628 ms
graph.facebook.com
721 ms
count.json
712 ms
graph.facebook.com
792 ms
count.json
711 ms
graph.facebook.com
826 ms
count.json
710 ms
graph.facebook.com
853 ms
count.json
726 ms
graph.facebook.com
837 ms
count.json
724 ms
graph.facebook.com
837 ms
count.json
756 ms
graph.facebook.com
836 ms
count.json
753 ms
graph.facebook.com
848 ms
count.json
752 ms
graph.facebook.com
857 ms
count.json
748 ms
graph.facebook.com
872 ms
count.json
747 ms
graph.facebook.com
871 ms
count.json
752 ms
graph.facebook.com
868 ms
count.json
796 ms
graph.facebook.com
885 ms
count.json
793 ms
graph.facebook.com
868 ms
count.json
795 ms
graph.facebook.com
887 ms
count.json
807 ms
graph.facebook.com
906 ms
count.json
798 ms
graph.facebook.com
907 ms
count.json
791 ms
graph.facebook.com
907 ms
count.json
819 ms
graph.facebook.com
904 ms
count.json
814 ms
graph.facebook.com
917 ms
count.json
812 ms
graph.facebook.com
932 ms
count.json
814 ms
graph.facebook.com
968 ms
count.json
818 ms
graph.facebook.com
936 ms
count.json
817 ms
graph.facebook.com
940 ms
count.json
828 ms
graph.facebook.com
972 ms
count.json
830 ms
graph.facebook.com
958 ms
count.json
827 ms
graph.facebook.com
965 ms
count.json
824 ms
graph.facebook.com
969 ms
count.json
826 ms
graph.facebook.com
977 ms
count.json
825 ms
graph.facebook.com
999 ms
count.json
838 ms
graph.facebook.com
1002 ms
count.json
832 ms
graph.facebook.com
1012 ms
count.json
880 ms
graph.facebook.com
1013 ms
count.json
830 ms
graph.facebook.com
1001 ms
count.json
829 ms
graph.facebook.com
1014 ms
count.json
833 ms
graph.facebook.com
1039 ms
g.gif
472 ms
g.gif
408 ms
g.gif
470 ms
g.gif
408 ms
g.gif
469 ms
g.gif
486 ms
g.gif
485 ms
g.gif
485 ms
g.gif
484 ms
g.gif
487 ms
g.gif
487 ms
g.gif
496 ms
g.gif
497 ms
g.gif
499 ms
g.gif
517 ms
g.gif
497 ms
g.gif
498 ms
g.gif
501 ms
g.gif
517 ms
g.gif
516 ms
g.gif
514 ms
g.gif
515 ms
g.gif
518 ms
g.gif
521 ms
g.gif
524 ms
g.gif
519 ms
g.gif
521 ms
g.gif
524 ms
g.gif
521 ms
g.gif
523 ms
g.gif
524 ms
g.gif
525 ms
g.gif
525 ms
g.gif
525 ms
g.gif
527 ms
jquery.js
88 ms
postmessage.js
161 ms
jed.js
160 ms
underscore.min.js
160 ms
g.gif
128 ms
g.gif
128 ms
g.gif
68 ms
g.gif
66 ms
g.gif
68 ms
count.json
180 ms
count.json
228 ms
count.json
186 ms
g.gif
63 ms
count.json
180 ms
graph.facebook.com
377 ms
g.gif
54 ms
g.gif
54 ms
g.gif
55 ms
g.gif
55 ms
count.json
176 ms
g.gif
54 ms
g.gif
54 ms
count.json
170 ms
g.gif
45 ms
g.gif
45 ms
g.gif
45 ms
g.gif
45 ms
g.gif
44 ms
g.gif
42 ms
count.json
166 ms
count.json
168 ms
g.gif
30 ms
count.json
169 ms
count.json
170 ms
g.gif
31 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
32 ms
count.json
174 ms
count.json
200 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
29 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
29 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
29 ms
g.gif
29 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
27 ms
g.gif
27 ms
g.gif
29 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
29 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
30 ms
g.gif
30 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
30 ms
graph.facebook.com
301 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
31 ms
g.gif
31 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
34 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
36 ms
count.json
137 ms
count.json
139 ms
count.json
199 ms
graph.facebook.com
285 ms
graph.facebook.com
278 ms
graph.facebook.com
282 ms
graph.facebook.com
327 ms
likes-rest.js
15 ms
graph.facebook.com
282 ms
graph.facebook.com
285 ms
32 ms
graph.facebook.com
307 ms
graph.facebook.com
310 ms
graph.facebook.com
287 ms
graph.facebook.com
306 ms
graph.facebook.com
306 ms
7 ms
graph.facebook.com
319 ms
graph.facebook.com
326 ms
5 ms
writeincolour.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
writeincolour.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
writeincolour.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writeincolour.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writeincolour.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
writeincolour.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Write In Colour. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: