21.9 sec in total
324 ms
21.3 sec
255 ms
Visit writelady.net now to see the best up-to-date Write Lady content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about writelady.net
Write about our World!
Visit writelady.netWe analyzed Writelady.net page load time and found that the first response time was 324 ms and then it took 21.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
writelady.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value0.169
70/100
15%
Value8.8 s
36/100
10%
324 ms
83 ms
146 ms
139 ms
202 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Writelady.net, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Writelady.net.
Page size can be reduced by 955.6 kB (76%)
1.3 MB
296.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Writelady.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Write Lady needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 812.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 812.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 115.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writelady.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 115.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (76%)
46
11
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Write Lady. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
writelady.net
324 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
83 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
146 ms
jquery.fileupload-ui.css
139 ms
style.css
202 ms
style.css
164 ms
style.css
158 ms
title-excerpt-thumbnail.css
170 ms
writelady.net
710 ms
style.css
207 ms
jquery.js
347 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
241 ms
wps.min.js
360 ms
jscharts.min.js
349 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js
396 ms
jwplayer.js
389 ms
tmpl.min.js
393 ms
load-image.min.js
393 ms
canvas-to-blob.min.js
415 ms
jquery.iframe-transport.js
453 ms
jquery.fileupload.js
451 ms
jquery.fileupload-fp.js
448 ms
jquery.fileupload-ui.js
457 ms
wps.min.css
473 ms
core.min.js
525 ms
widget.min.js
542 ms
tabs.min.js
548 ms
jquery.posttabs.js
546 ms
comment-reply.min.js
534 ms
superfish.js
583 ms
superfish.args.js
594 ms
jflow.plus.js
670 ms
wp-embed.min.js
601 ms
css
58 ms
css
78 ms
css
91 ms
lightbodybg.png
58 ms
writelady.net
187 ms
footer.png
97 ms
barbie-add-to-page.gif
110 ms
lady-with-glasses.jpg
102 ms
slider-previous.png
309 ms
slider-next.png
309 ms
widgets.js
144 ms
chat.css
165 ms
busy.gif
282 ms
ad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536
28 ms
URL]
19517 ms
writelady.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
writelady.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
writelady.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writelady.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writelady.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
writelady.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Write Lady. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: