Tools & Wizards About Us
writing-reviews.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

writing-reviews.com

College Paper Writing Services Reviews | Make A Right Choice

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

623 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

318 ms

writing-reviews.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Writing Reviews content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about writing-reviews.com

Spend some time reading a review website to make sure you have all of the necessary information with you. Make a well-informed choice today.

Visit writing-reviews.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Writing-reviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 623 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

writing-reviews.com performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.248

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

writing-reviews.com

623 ms

compressed-unified.css

442 ms

style.css

505 ms

css.css

19 ms

default.min.css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Writing-reviews.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Writing-reviews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.8 kB (21%)

Content Size

241.7 kB

After Optimization

190.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Writing-reviews.com main page is 241.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 108.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 47.0 kB

  • Original 56.3 kB
  • After minification 51.3 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 53.2 kB
  • After minification 49.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writing Reviews images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 336 B

  • Original 108.4 kB
  • After minification 108.4 kB
  • After compression 108.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 431 B

  • Original 23.9 kB
  • After minification 23.9 kB
  • After compression 23.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writing-reviews.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (56%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writing Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

writing-reviews.com

writing-reviews.com

623 ms

compressed-unified.css

compressed-unified.css

442 ms

style.css

style.css

505 ms

css.css

css.css

19 ms

default.min.css

default.min.css

21 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

19 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

536 ms

js.min.js

js.min.js

502 ms

compressed-unified.js

compressed-unified.js

29 ms

cwppos-widget.css

cwppos-widget.css

48 ms

cwppos-widget-style1.css

cwppos-widget-style1.css

62 ms

cwppos-widget-rating.css

cwppos-widget-rating.css

62 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

70 ms

jquery.datatables.min.js

jquery.datatables.min.js

72 ms

pie-chart.js

pie-chart.js

629 ms

main.js

main.js

81 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

95 ms

logo-2.png

logo-2.png

531 ms

bs.png

bs.png

678 ms

logo-1.png

logo-1.png

84 ms

down-light.png

down-light.png

564 ms

star-1-1.png

star-1-1.png

507 ms

star-2-1.png

star-2-1.png

139 ms

star-3-1.png

star-3-1.png

590 ms

star-4.png

star-4.png

139 ms

star-5.png

star-5.png

139 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

599 ms

Raleway-Regular.ttf

Raleway-Regular.ttf

970 ms

Raleway-Thin.ttf

Raleway-Thin.ttf

1079 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

Accessibility Review

writing-reviews.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

writing-reviews.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

writing-reviews.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writing-reviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writing-reviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

writing-reviews.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Writing Reviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: