Tools & Wizards About Us
writingacademia.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

writingacademia.com

国产精品99久久免费,国产精品JIZZ视频,国产公开免费人成视频

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

267 ms

writingacademia.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to writingacademia.com homepage info - get ready to check Writingacademia best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about writingacademia.com

↑2月最火视频在线:国产精品99久久免费_国产精品JIZZ视频,国产公开免费人成视频！本站国产精品99久久免费的在线视频內容全!每日更新最新影片！適度觀看電影,合理安排時間,享受健康生活！

Visit writingacademia.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Writingacademia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

writingacademia.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.084

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.writingacademia.com

1544 ms

css

24 ms

styles.css

46 ms

styles.css

46 ms

gridism.css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Writingacademia.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Writingacademia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 365.2 kB (65%)

Content Size

560.6 kB

After Optimization

195.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Writingacademia.com main page is 560.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 253.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 34.0 kB

  • Original 43.1 kB
  • After minification 40.5 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 38.0 kB
  • After minification 33.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Writingacademia needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 130.5 kB

  • Original 226.2 kB
  • After minification 221.4 kB
  • After compression 95.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 130.5 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 195.9 kB

  • Original 253.3 kB
  • After minification 237.1 kB
  • After compression 57.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writingacademia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 195.9 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (79%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writingacademia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.writingacademia.com

www.writingacademia.com

1544 ms

css

css

24 ms

styles.css

styles.css

46 ms

styles.css

styles.css

46 ms

gridism.css

gridism.css

48 ms

rating.min.css

rating.min.css

52 ms

style.css

style.css

53 ms

style.css

style.css

47 ms

custom-editor-style.css

custom-editor-style.css

59 ms

stylesheets.css

stylesheets.css

60 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

60 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

60 ms

app.css

app.css

59 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

63 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

65 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

96 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

77 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

82 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

80 ms

photon.js

photon.js

83 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

84 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

150 ms

rating.min.js

rating.min.js

149 ms

devicepx-jetpack.js

devicepx-jetpack.js

68 ms

gprofiles.js

gprofiles.js

69 ms

wpgroho.js

wpgroho.js

147 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

204 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

203 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

205 ms

count.js

count.js

205 ms

e-201609.js

e-201609.js

24 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

206 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

122 ms

logo70x62.png

logo70x62.png

124 ms

IELTS.png

IELTS.png

112 ms

TOEFL-logo.png

TOEFL-logo.png

107 ms

TOEIC-logo.png

TOEIC-logo.png

107 ms

s-left1.png

s-left1.png

1227 ms

Writing-Academia-footer-logo.png

Writing-Academia-footer-logo.png

318 ms

Sh5y9ATXtXKFxn1y2pIqd_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff

Sh5y9ATXtXKFxn1y2pIqd_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff

318 ms

QABk9IxT-LFTJ_dQzv7xpCfE9Gpc2xZQgtwyMvPhThE.woff

QABk9IxT-LFTJ_dQzv7xpCfE9Gpc2xZQgtwyMvPhThE.woff

318 ms

count.js

count.js

255 ms

hovercard.css

hovercard.css

248 ms

services.css

services.css

251 ms

O_WhD9hODL16N4KLHLX7xRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

O_WhD9hODL16N4KLHLX7xRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff

230 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

250 ms

MonoSocialIconsFont-1.10.ttf

MonoSocialIconsFont-1.10.ttf

250 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

231 ms

g.gif

g.gif

219 ms

collect

collect

78 ms

collect

collect

63 ms

Accessibility Review

writingacademia.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

writingacademia.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

writingacademia.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingacademia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Writingacademia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

writingacademia.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Writingacademia. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: