4 sec in total
366 ms
3.2 sec
511 ms
Welcome to writingfaith.org homepage info - get ready to check Writingfaith best content right away, or after learning these important things about writingfaith.org
Writers group in the Roanoke Valley that promote Christian writing.
Visit writingfaith.orgWe analyzed Writingfaith.org page load time and found that the first response time was 366 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
writingfaith.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value3,410 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value12.7 s
13/100
10%
366 ms
195 ms
785 ms
187 ms
99 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Writingfaith.org, 31% (10 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com and 19% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Writingfaith.org.
Page size can be reduced by 142.2 kB (14%)
1.0 MB
863.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Writingfaith.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 691.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writingfaith images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 85.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.4 kB or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writingfaith.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 37% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (77%)
22
5
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writingfaith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
writingfaith.org
366 ms
www.writingfaith.org
195 ms
www.writingfaith.org
785 ms
gdprscript.js
187 ms
sites.css
99 ms
fancybox.css
113 ms
social-icons.css
113 ms
main_style.css
350 ms
css
78 ms
css
96 ms
css
111 ms
jquery.min.js
105 ms
stl.js
110 ms
main.js
123 ms
plugins.js
726 ms
custom.js
718 ms
mobile.js
718 ms
main-customer-accounts-site.js
124 ms
Lighthouse.jpg
128 ms
1467835782.png
1063 ms
sdk.js
74 ms
Writing.jpg
73 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQVJz9d.ttf
572 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQVJz9d.ttf
573 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQVJz9d.ttf
926 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQVJz9d.ttf
972 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJPkqh8m9eY.ttf
975 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJPkqh8m9eY.ttf
975 ms
wsocial.woff
64 ms
sdk.js
126 ms
ga.js
528 ms
snowday262.js
123 ms
writingfaith.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
writingfaith.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
writingfaith.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingfaith.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writingfaith.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
writingfaith.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Writingfaith. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: