Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

writingfaith.org

Roanoke Valley Christian Writers - About

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

366 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

511 ms

writingfaith.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to writingfaith.org homepage info - get ready to check Writingfaith best content right away, or after learning these important things about writingfaith.org

Writers group in the Roanoke Valley that promote Christian writing.

Visit writingfaith.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Writingfaith.org page load time and found that the first response time was 366 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

writingfaith.org performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.2 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,410 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

writingfaith.org

366 ms

www.writingfaith.org

195 ms

www.writingfaith.org

785 ms

gdprscript.js

187 ms

sites.css

99 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Writingfaith.org, 31% (10 requests) were made to Cdn2.editmysite.com and 19% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Writingfaith.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 142.2 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

863.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Writingfaith.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 691.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 34.9 kB

  • Original 46.3 kB
  • After minification 45.8 kB
  • After compression 11.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 691.0 kB
  • After minification 691.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writingfaith images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 85.4 kB

  • Original 209.1 kB
  • After minification 159.4 kB
  • After compression 123.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.4 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 21.9 kB

  • Original 59.5 kB
  • After minification 56.5 kB
  • After compression 37.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writingfaith.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (77%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writingfaith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

writingfaith.org accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

writingfaith.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

writingfaith.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writingfaith.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writingfaith.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Writingfaith. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: